Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (8413)	1/6/1998 3:11:00 PM
From: O-MY-O	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

children, children Please take it someplace else. It is really getting old.

To: JDN who wrote (8413)	1/6/1998 3:14:00 PM
From: Starduster	Respond to of 31646

JDN: Just finished reading TheStreet and others and agree with you. Don't think they will produce negative until they have time to cover they're derriere! Sandie

To: JDN who wrote (8413)	1/6/1998 3:18:00 PM
From: Hardrocker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

JDN, There's an interesting article in today's IBD about YTK stocks (page A21). I'm at work, so I don't have time to post excerpts. But the article is very positive for Y2K investors overall, although no mention of TPRO. If anyone wishes, I'll gladly post excerpts later this evening. This company is no scam as has recently been implied, we're merely on the ground floor of an undiscovered gem. Contract announcements would be nice, but many large companies are probably skittish about divulging potentially huge hits to the bottom line. It appears that almost all Y2K investigation/remediation work is expense money, directly decrementing profit. If I am the CEO of Boeing, I'm not sure I would want to broadcast that sort of news. So TPRO's earnings over the next few quarters will tell the story. Hardrocker

To: JDN who wrote (8413)	1/6/1998 9:03:00 PM
From: biffpincus	Respond to of 31646

<<Dear Biff: Has it occurred to you that if people like Cramer were to publicly state the Y2K negative it could significantly effect their other stock holdings? Personally, I dont think they will cover Y2K in any depth until they have no other choice. JDN>> Perhaps that might explain it. My problem with his non-view is how does he explain potential record revenues over a period of years without even considering the kind of multiple it should sell at? If he found an undervalued Y2k, why wouldn't it be worth his consideration? And, in regard to Cory's story, I was a bit dissapointed in it. Basically, an overview of stock stories (thankfully TPRO was mentioned in a good light - but only with 160% growth over the year. I think he undercut us by a couple of hundred percentage points). But, he really didn't deal with the fundamentals of the Y2k story, the attention it is getting from governmental, business and financial concerns. The real problem that it represents and the role that companies involved in its remediation can play. biff