Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (1009440)	4/2/2017 10:24:57 PM
From: Bonefish	Respond to of 1572139

Climate science is more of a compilation of the hard sciences. Direct testing is difficult or non existent. Tracking is really what they do and they can skew that. They were really low priority before they hit the grant money jackpot due the global warming movement.

To: i-node who wrote (1009440)	4/2/2017 10:57:55 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572139

"We don't have any Feynmans or Einsteins. People who are true to the cause of the Scientific Method" I suspect you don't know the scientific method from shinola.

To: i-node who wrote (1009440)	4/4/2017 3:42:25 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Respond to of 1572139

I'm really starting to question the extent to which "hard science" even exists as a thing. We don't have any Feynmans or Einsteins. People who are true to the cause of the Scientific Method. Today it is just as it has been for decades. Publish [quickly] or perish. You can make a lifetime of study out of something so long as you can get some inkling of success early on. Even it is bogus (in re: Michael Mann). I think you've got your green eye shade on too tight.......you have no idea of what you speak...how would you recognize a scientist?