Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Winn who wrote (8414)	1/6/1998 3:15:00 PM
From: Josef Svejk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Mike, all humbleness aside - you bring out the worst in me! I've never asked Jill to bounce anyone off SI, being intimately familiar with how it feels. Matter of fact, I makle it a policy do defend just about any moron's right to post here . . . However, you're either going do visit the TPRO Research thread, and learn what this company is about, and learn to be civil in public, or I'm going to shoot off an e-mail to Jill, asking her to can you! I mean it! Now - shut up, study, learn - then post! Svejk (GL-15 applies: digiserve.com ;-) P.S. Didn't your mother ever teach you how to apologize?

To: Mike Winn who wrote (8414)	1/6/1998 3:19:00 PM
From: Jack Zahran	Respond to of 31646

Well Mike, it looks like your fellow engineers think you have no training. Here is a quote: Only a Liberal without training in the field would even dare to suggest that the problem is either "simple", "direct", or "standard". When one talks about embedded systems where the source code is now non-existent, transfers between systems, (Novell alone uses 7 layers of code just to transfer a few bytes of information across the wire, and the receiving end has to strip those 7 layers to be able to use those few bytes of information), not to mention Main Frames and the multitude of languages that they talk among themselves, and then do translations to talk to your average personal computer, it is shameful and ignorant to even suggest trying to shovel a freight train into one of those "one-size fits all T-Shirts".

To: Mike Winn who wrote (8414)	1/6/1998 4:11:00 PM
From: JDN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

Dear Mike: I am only going to say this once so read carefully. TPRO UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF CHAIRMAN JENKINS has stated publicly and privately that their goal is to become a NATIONAL FACTORY INTEGRATOR. They realized about July of 1997 that they had a ONE TIME opportunity through the designing of a tool to AID IN UNCOVERING POTENTIAL IMBEDDED SYSTEM Y2K problems to reach the HIGHEST LEVELS of Companies many of which were ALREADY CLIENTS at a local plant level. They are pursuing that goal and based upon their oral statements (CC's), their financial statements (huge revenue growth) and their Alliances we have EVERY REASON to BELIEVE that they are being successful in their attempts to grow to a National scale. I am a CPA not an Engineer. I cannot refute or comment on anything technically which you say but I can read a financial statement as well as anyone on this or any other board, I have worked with top management of public companies my entire career. I have seen nothing which leads me to believe there is a scam or anything else going on which is not in the best interest of the shareholder. Some of you that have been on this board know me and know that I dont bullshit. Yes, I have a substantial position in this stock but it is only about 5% of my total investments. Not because I dont like TPRO but because I have a rule, I never invest more than 5% in any one company no matter who it is. That is all I have to say. JDN