Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tech who wrote (2022)	1/6/1998 3:36:00 PM
From: Trader X	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3391

No, I remembered to include I believe... check it out. I also believe CSGI is trying very hard to downplay this current investigation, to the detriment of it's shareholders. What you seem to forget by stating my conversation proves angel is lying, is that it becomes obvious to even the most casual reader that I passed on an opportunity to lie about my conversation with the NASD, which demonstrates my conviction toward the truth. Not lies, as you STATE IN ALL CAPS BECAUSE YOU BELIEVE THAT HE WHO TALKS LOUDER WINS THE ARGUMENT! Fortunately, readers of this thread are more intelligent than you give them credit for.

To: tech who wrote (2022)	1/6/1998 4:54:00 PM
From: Trader X	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3391

Wrong again, techno. Man, do I get tired of having to say you're wrong! But it does feel good, although I am beginning to pity you. <<Your own converstation with NASDAQ proves that no one at NASDAQ would have said "no company would be approved if they had an open investigation.">> Wrong. Even a middle school dropout could see that my conversation with NASDAQ only proves what they told me. Not what they told angel. Can I recommend a good book in beginning logic for you? Actually, I'm starting to tire of making you my whipping boy, so I may disappear for a while. I remain, Kevin *