SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pass pass who wrote (12328)1/6/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: BillyG  Respond to of 25960
 
From the December 22, 1997 Issue of Electronic News

HAVE YOUR FAB, BUT NO STEPPERS--When Motorola came asking about placing a 0.35-micron-capable fab in
China, the U.S. government gave them the Old Kinderhook (OK) on the idea. From what EN has been able to learn, the
U.S. government is still saying 'Go ahead, everything is A-OK.' You can build your fab--except we can't let you have any
Silicon Valley Group Micrascan step-and-scan deep-ultraviolet lithography systems that you ordered or at least not until
you get an export license. If this were baseball, it seems to be the equivalent of the umpire saying 'Let's play ball.' Except
when the players take the field and the batter steps up to the plate, the umpire grabs the bat and says, 'Oh, you can't have
that. You need the proper paperwork to use this bat.' Not exactly fair, said one industry member, and that may be an
understatement for the year. Paper and the lithography export license process seems to have put the kibosh on SVG's
shipment to Motorola's China fab. SVG says that any financial effects would be minimal and the news does not harm its
relationship with Motorola. Given U.S. lithography's efforts to stop U.S. money from benefitting foreign litho equipment
makers via the Extreme Ultra Violet LLC consortium and now this uphill battle, perhaps SVG's one-time lobbyist Wayne
Sayer did not make as many friends in D.C. as it was hoped.



To: pass pass who wrote (12328)1/6/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: Mr. Aloha  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25960
 
I think a lot of attention should be focused on what AMAT just said and how the 1997 picture looked.

dailystocks.net

Here's AMAT's current estimates...

dailystocks.net

Geez... I'm getting all kinds of Qtly. earnings figures??

Aloha