Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (1010018)	4/5/2017 10:48:51 PM
From: i-node	3 Recommendations Recommended By Bonefish jlallen one_less Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572533

A stunt? You are hilarious. Please address the point. If science of the consensus is what you believe in, let's hear your critique of Crighten's article. You claim you are an intellectual, so let's hear your intellectual differentiation of the logic between the two concepts. I don't think you are capable.

To: koan who wrote (1010018)	4/6/2017 7:50:36 AM
From: Taro	1 Recommendation Recommended By jlallen Respond to of 1572533

i-node posted: "But you HAVE claimed that broad scientific support implies the creation of scientific fact. You HAVE done that. And the same was done as proof of scientific fact in regard to eugenics. So, how do you square these two views WITHOUT admitting your claims about global warming are wrong?" i-node is right, man! You have repeatedly posted to me as well, that 'since 97% of the scientists - as well as you - support AGW, your point like theirs cannot possibly be wrong!' /Taro