Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (1010129)

4/6/2017 1:05:16 PM

From: koan

Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572630

When you make a foolish comment that 97% of the scientists of the day supported eugenics you pollute your entire post.

You have no idea what the percentage was. That is just more of your pulling stuff out of your ass as you do frequently.

Crichton was a fool and I don't bother reading fools. Life is short.

My advice to you and I-node is increase the quality of your mentors.

<<

Eugenics was formulated a long time ago when our thinking was still quite primitive, sure, but...

yes, in hindsight it may look like being primitive, but that was certainly not the case in it's heydays, when it was massively supported by 97% of those scientists, who truly understood and had done research into the same matter. Furthermore, one could argue, that with Darwin's "Survival of the fittest" in mind, Eugenics to them only added some extra 'help' to enhance the evolution towards better and more fit future generations!