Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (1010193)	4/6/2017 5:46:59 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By Investor Clouseau Taro Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1573766

And there you go again. >> it wasn't until recently that science really refined its abilities to monitor itself and conduct experiments. Seriously? It is apparent you have never studied mathematics. Check this out on who conducted experiments when: en.wikipedia.org As to "monitoring itself", that's been happening for centuries. Mistakes have been made, someone finds them and fixes them. But if you are even REMOTELY suggesting that "peer review" reflects the robustness of THAT process, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. Peer review is a joke and is to some extent responsible for the Global Warming mess, by providing credibility where none was due. >> The fact that you can't see that the scientists today are much more numerous and sophisticated and most likely correct about anthropogenic global warming says it all. The evidence is overwhelming. And I'll just tell you, I'm waiting to see a glimmer of genius from the Warmist community. An Einstein or Feynman. It just isn't there. Now, the closest thing we've had is Freeman Dyson, who laid out the facts with careful precision. And was roundly criticized as though he were a senile old bastard -- NOT because of his scientific basis, but because it didn't agree with the global warming religion and political party. I understand: Your knowledge of basic science is essentially nonexistent. I've witnessed your inability to solve a 9th grade arithmetic problem with competence, so I know where you are with it comes to math & statistics. But if you are going to comment on it you ought to be able to make an argument other than, "Michael Mann said it."

To: koan who wrote (1010193)	4/6/2017 6:31:14 PM
From: Taro	Respond to of 1573766

The fact that you can't see that the scientists today are much more numerous and sophisticated and most likely correct about anthropogenic global warming says it all. The evidence is overwhelming. Can't you just gather your credo and all the stuff to go with it and seclude yourself in the Church of your AGW religion for now now? That's where you belong to spend some value time with your religion in your effort to find your real God and with him pave the way for the AGW Messias to come!