Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (91568)	4/7/2017 7:16:41 AM
From: Mongo2116	2 Recommendations Recommended By GoodGord Hawkmoon Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218388

I think its only one airfield out of 6 and an airfield can be fixed up pretty quick.....probably for a lot less than the 100 million in missiles it cost to destroy it

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (91568)	4/7/2017 9:17:18 AM
From: Hawkmoon	3 Recommendations Recommended By Ms. Baby Boomer Qualified Opinion toccodolce Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218388

I just wish I was convinced that Assad committed the chemical attack. Watched enough footage of the "rescuers" to have serious concerns about the veracity of the reports (no protective suits handing exposed victims.. etc).. If what I, and many others, are pondering is true, it would mean these Islamists actually exposed and killed those kids and tried to make it look like Assad's forces did it. Which means that Trump fell victim to a "Wag the Dog" scenario.. That said, something needs to happen to stop this civil war and create safe zones for refugees. And this has been Trump's stated policy.. Hawk