SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (76014)4/10/2017 3:41:21 PM
From: Eric  Respond to of 86355
 
Be patient.

Every car and truck manufacture in the world is working overtime ramping up EV production.

Europe's manufacturers got caught with their pants down!

Tesla is way, way ahead of just about everyone.

It's all about the battery cells and Tesla has a good 3 to 4 year jump on just about everyone with the Gigafactory.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (76014)4/11/2017 8:59:52 AM
From: Eric  Respond to of 86355
 
San Diego Sets Vision, Vets Options for 100% Renewables

April 10th, 2017 by John Farrell

Originally published on ilsr.org.

Late last year, San Diego set a landmark goal that made it the largest U.S. city to target a 100% renewable electricity mix over the next two decades. But as the pact’s first anniversary approaches, big questions loom over how exactly San Diego will hit the ambitious benchmark.



This is part of a series released in October 2016 for Energy Awareness Month highlighting communities and community energy projects on ILSR’s Community Power Map.

The cornerstone of its efforts so far is a legally binding Climate Action Plan, approved by the City Council, to slice its roughly 13 million-metric-ton carbon footprint in half by 2035. Early projections show San Diego’s switch to renewables would cut 1.6 million metric tons of carbon production, adding to other carbon-reduction initiatives like adjusting traffic lights to reduce idling and replacing up to 90% of the city’s auto fleet with electric vehicles.

San Diego’s Climate Action Plan mirrors similar commitments made in other cities. San Diego’s Republican mayor has touted the play as an economic stimulus anchored by a burgeoning clean energy industry. But San Diego hasn’t come as far as some other municipalities. Officials there still haven’t outlined a specific strategy for the transition to renewables.

Local advocates, including those at City Hall, expect San Diego to lean on solar power to build out its renewables portfolio. The city is known for its year-round sunshine, priming it for rooftop solar and arrays atop parking lots.

But bigger changes will likely lead the way.

On a wider scale, the city is considering community choice energy. Under that framework, the city, rather than local utility company San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), would choose its electricity supply. Community choice aggregation also allows local governments to aggregate electricity demand between them, boosting their collective buying power. Other California communities have already jumped, including Marin County, Sonoma County, and San Francisco.

But not everyone is embracing that solution. As San Diego evaluates community choice, tensions are bubbling up over what a program would mean for San Diego’s existing energy economy.

For example, this summer SDG&E won regulatory approval to mount a public relations campaign against community choice aggregation — a move that triggered blowback from clean energy supporters worried the utility will hold back the bigger vision.

“SDG&E has made clear they’ll stop at nothing to stifle the voices and the freedom of choice for families and businesses who want better energy options to save money, clean the air and create a brighter, healthier future with homegrown clean power,” said Nicole Capretz, executive director of the Climate Action Campaign, an advocacy group pushing the renewables plan.

The concern makes sense, after millions spent by another California utility, Pacific Gas & Electric, stalled the launch of the state’s first community choice program in Marin County by nearly a decade.

It’s important to note that the city’s 100% pledge is electricity-only. Contrary to some initial reports, the city won’t phase out non-electricity natural gas use as part of its 2035 goal. The caveat means the use of natural gas to heat homes and power water heaters and ovens will continue, at least in part, beyond 2035.

Still, even if San Diego’s commitment to renewables covers only electricity, it stands to disrupt the existing utility’s plans to shift more slowly to abundant local renewable energy resources. A 2010 study, for example, noted that San Diego County had enough residential and commercial rooftop space to meet the peak energy needs of the city, and supply one-half the annual electricity needs.

San Diego’s plan may be a bit lean so far, but it’s got a lot more meat to the renewable energy transition than many other cities.

cleantechnica.com

To learn more about the national movement toward distributed generation and renewables, visit ILSR’s interactive Community Power Map. The tool showcases programming, policies and projects across the U.S., and compares state-by-state performance. Bookmark it and check back for updates.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (76014)4/11/2017 9:46:01 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
Off to a bumbling start at Interior
Anthony Watts / 10 mins ago April 8, 2017

If this is the kind of housecleaning and swamp draining we’re going to get, we’re in real trouble

[ We should start suing every solar panel installation and wind turbine construction over hypothetical endangered bumblebees. ]

Guest opinion by Paul Driessen

Was it because there were too few senior Trump Administration officials in place to catch and stop it? Or because Department of the Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke was new on the job, and had so much on his plate, that this decision just slipped right past him?

Maybe it was because the new Administration faces so many battles with environmental activists already that it didn’t want another one? Or perhaps Interior was intimidated by environmentalist lawsuits challenging President Trump’s 60-day delay of newly-issued Obama Administration regulations?

Whatever the reason, Trump’s Interior Department opened a real can of worms when it let the Obama Administration’s last-minute endangered species designation for the rusty patched bumblebee (RPB) take effect March 21 – exactly 60 days after President Trump issued his regulatory Executive Order.

The designation has serious adverse implications for Mr. Trump’s ambitious plans for infrastructure improvements, economic growth, job creation, and reining in regulatory abuse and overreach.

Already, officials in the Minneapolis area have delayed a road construction project – purportedly near a patch of potential RPB habitat – while they look for signs that the bees are actually nesting there. Another Minnesota group is trying to use hypothetical threats to RPBs to delay construction of a wastewater treatment plant that would prevent pollution from reaching sensitive state waterways!

And this is just the beginning. It will happen again and again as anti-development agitators use this designation to theorize that construction projects and even farming operations could risk harming an “endangered” bee species or its possible habitats.

In issuing the “endangered” designation, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) advised that “The rusty patched bumblebee is likely to be present in scattered locations that cover only 0.1% of the species’ historical range.” Thus, government agencies need only be consulted or issue a permit for developers to “take” (disturb, harm or kill) the bees in these limited areas.

However, 0.1% of the RPB’s historic range is still an area of roughly 6,000 square miles: 3.8 million acres – equivalent to all of Connecticut and Rhode Island combined. And that’s just the beginning.

The real kicker is that no one knows where that 0.1% area might be, scattered in tiny bits and pieces all across the 13 Northeast and Midwest states where the rusty patched bumblebee has supposedly been observed (by amateur entomologists) since 2000. That’s 378 million acres: equal to the combined land area of Montana, North and South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois and Indiana!

That’s partly because the Obama FWS issued the endangered species designation without developing any protocols for actually identifying the ground-dwelling bee’s nesting sites. They could be anywhere in that 13-state area – which means environmentalists could delay, block or bankrupt every new power line, bridge, highway, pipeline, housing development, plowing operation or other project in the affected states.

The decision gives eco-obstructionists another powerful weapon against projects they oppose. They’ve already proven they are smart, determined, coordinated, well-funded opponents of President Trump’s infrastructure, energy, job and economic improvement agendas. Why give them more power?

Even worse, this insect designation opens the floodgates. Whether Secretary Zinke realizes it or not, waiting in the obstructionist wings, right behind the rusty patched bumblebee, are two more bumblebee species whose potential habitats spread across 40 states. The yellow-banded bumblebee has been found all the way from Montana east to New England, and down the Atlantic coast to Virginia, West Virginia and North Carolina. The western bumblebee’s range includes the entire block of eleven western states plus parts of Alaska: nearly a billion acres.

Put together, we’re talking about nearly half of the United States!

That’s a monstrous new complication for property owners, states and communities – and for the Trump Administration’s economic plans – at the end of a long, painful decade of economic doldrums that require concerted efforts to get job and economic growth back on track. And there’s even more to come.

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature says over one-fourth of 47 native North American bumblebee species face possible extinction. Other radical greens now claim hundreds of wild bee species are “threatened with” or “headed for” extinction. The Center for Biological Diversity asserts that 749 wild bee species are in decline, and half of them face serious risk of extinction.

Real entomologists dispute this. A recent article notes that the CBD report was not peer-reviewed and presented no methodologies or data sources. It quotes Sam Droege, one of North America’s top wild bee experts, who calls the report “extremely misleading” and full of “statistical, taxonomic and natural history problems.” Assertions that some species are in decline are simply false and not based on any evidence, Droege explained. For other species, there simply is not enough data to make any accurate assessment.

This is the Pandora’s box that Secretary Zinke’s Department of the Interior has unleashed, by failing to keep a lid on the FWS actions or review the Obama Administration’s politically motivated, hurry-up designation. In fact, Zinke’s department had ample reason to revise the rusty patched bumblebee designation on January 9, when Team Obama announced its plans. The DOI just bumbled it.

When the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation originally petitioned the FWS for an RPB endangered species designation, it said the species’ decline was due to habitat loss and disease – specifically an intestinal parasite that was accidentally imported to the USA from Europe in the 1990s, during experiments on managed bumblebee hives. But Obama’s FWS arbitrarily contorted its justifications to blame pesticides (specifically advanced-technology neonicotinoid pesticides, a key target du jour of the Environmental Left) for the bee’s decline. There is virtually no evidence to support that.

“The exact cause for the loss of the rusty patched is unclear,” says University of Virginia biology professor T’ai Roulston, “but it’s almost certainly related to disease: the Nosema bombi fungal gut parasite, which can shorten the lives of worker bees and disrupt mating success and survival of queens and males.”

Even more absurd and outrageous, the same Obama USFWS has given wind turbine companies permits to kill hundreds of bald and golden eagles – and thousands of raptors, other birds and bats, many of them threatened or endangered – every year for the next 30 years. So now the mere possibility that insect species could inhabit tiny areas across hundreds of millions of acres can be used to shut down projects, but the FWS will ignore wind turbines that are “incidentally” or “accidentally” killing eagles.

Now that Secretary Zinke has let the rusty patched bumblebee endangered species designation take effect, what should he do? To paraphrase the physician’s oath, “First, do no more harm.”

The new Interior team needs to make doubly sure that no more of these dubious “endangered species” designations slip past them, especially when the less onerous and disruptive, but still protective, status of “threatened species” is available. Secretary Zinke should also take a long, hard look at the supposed justifications for the RPB’s endangered designation, and modify or reverse it as warranted. Terminating or “clean-desking” a few Fish & Wildlife ideologues and IED makers would also be in order.

Meanwhile, the House and Senate should evaluate this designation and its employment, economic and land use implications, pass a “joint resolution of disapproval” under the Congressional Review Act, and send it to the White House. President Trump should sign it forthwith, and support one more vital action.

In the hands of agitators, ideological bureaucrats and friendly judges, the Endangered Species Act has become a powerful weapon for controlling land use and obstructing projects. Reforming the act, to curb this kind of nonsense and abuse, would be a good next step once these immediate problems are fixed.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow ( www.CFACT.org) and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death.

wattsupwiththat.com