SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (76127)4/13/2017 11:28:34 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
russet

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
Permania - 100 Years In The Permian Oil Fields Of New Mexico And Texas

James Conca ,
CONTRIBUTOR
I write about nuclear, energy and the environment
Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.

The Permian Basin oil field in southeast New Mexico and west Texas first started producing shortly after World War I. But almost 100 years later, it seems to keep getting better, and may become the world’s biggest oil field. A combination of new technologies and global price wars has kept the basin amazingly productive.

There’s actually a word for this - it’s called Permania. And it’s on the lips of everyone in the Oil&Gas industry.

Many huge oil fields are famous throughout the world. The Ghawar field in Saudi Arabia, discovered in 1948, is considered the biggest and the best known, producing about 5 million barrels per day, with estimated reserves exceeding 70 billion barrels. And this is above the 70 billion or so already extracted. Ghawar is why Saudi Arabia leads OPEC.

But the Permian Basin, a 300-mile expanse from west Texas to southeastern New Mexico, is headed to becoming the biggest in the world. It is now the largest producing basin in the United States, having yielded almost 30 billion barrels of oil and 75 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Currently, the Permian is pumping about 2 million barrels of oil a day.

It’s gotten so busy that the town of Carlsbad, New Mexico has nary a vacant room given the many oil and gas people coming through. And they’ve been building new hotels as fast as they can.

The Permian Basin is almost unique in that it has so many oil and gas producing rock formations stacked one on top of each other, called multiple stacked plays, each of which is more than a thousand feet thick, ranging in depths from a few hundred feet to five miles below the surface (see figure from Tarka).

Courtesy of Tarka

Map of the Permian Basin in southeast New Mexico and west Texas showing the multiple stacked producing zones in cross-section. Even after a 100 years of production, the Permian Basin is producing more oil and gas than ever, thanks to new technologies and strategies.

Eighty percent of the reserves are located at less than 10,000-feet in a dozen or so stacked zones including the Yates, San Andres, Clear Fork, Spraberry, Wolfcamp, Yeso, Bone Spring, Avalon, Canyon, Morrow, Devonian, and Ellenberger formations.

In contrast, the Eagle Ford field in east Texas, another big field, has producing zones only two to three hundred feet thick.

According to Scott Sheffield, Executive Chairman and CEO of Pioneer Natural Resources, the Permian will end up being bigger than the Ghawar field, with more than 75 billion barrels in the Spraberry and Wolfcamp plays alone, 40 billion barrels in the Delaware, and more in new zones being discovered, like the Wolfcamp C. Sheffield thinks the totals will exceed 160 billion barrels.

The primary producing rock types are limestone, dolomite and sandstone that have high porosities. But advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have expanded production into unconventional, tight oil shales such as those found in the Wolfcamp formation.

In fact, it is precisely the technological advances that have opened up the Permian so much, innovations that have increased oil recovery from 5-7% only last year to 15-20% in 2017.

‘The reason productivity is dramatically increasing in the Permian Basin,’ says David Zusman, Managing Partner of Talara Capital Management, ‘is that there is directional drilling with longer laterals (horizontal drill lengths away from the vertical shaft), rising proppant intensity in wells (the particles that keep fracked wells open), tightening frac cluster spacing, and a shift to multi-well pad drilling - everything that allows operators to better stay in the producing zones and get more out of them. It has made the Permian the lowest cost basin in the United States, and likely the all-important marginal barrel globally.’

Surprisingly, the rig count isn’t as much of an indicator as it used to be, because each of those rigs are producing more. Rig count in the U.S. went from over 1,600 in 2014 to 350 at its lowest, and is now back up to 700 or so. But those 700 are producing more than ever before.

Some of these drill rigs can even walk around on their own from well to well (see figure).

Courtesy of Patterson-UTI Drilling Company

A Patterson-UTI APEX WALKING drilling rig, operating in the Permian Basin, uses hydraulic feet to walk from one drill site to another, able to move forward, sideways or in a circle with pipe racked back, without the need to move other primary equipment. These new technologies have not only reduced cost and increased efficiency, but have played an important role in the evolution of the industry in response to external forces like the recent Saudi-U.S. oil war.

According to SeakingAlpha, there were 285 horizontal/directional drill rigs operating in the Permian Basin at the end of March 2017, with 43 new rigs added in just the last two months.

The amazing productivity of the Permian Basin comes from its geologic history. From about 850 to 310 million years ago (from the Precambrian to the Mississippian), the ancestral Permian Basin was a shallow marine margin on the edge of a vast western sea, slowly accumulating marine carbonates, sediments and shales.

Then during the Permian, beginning about 300 million years ago, the North American continent collided with Gondwana Land (a supercontinent that later split apart into South America and Africa). This violent compression created two deep sub-basins, the Delaware and the Midland Basins. These filled with clastics (sediments like sands and gravels), and were surrounded by shallow shelves that precipitated carbonate rocks from reefs and shelled organisms of the shallow sea.

After that, the basins became slowly shut off from the ocean, intermittently flooding and evaporating for millions of years, precipitating thousands of feet of salt, some very pure and tight. The effect was a deep basin filled with marine sediments, capped by tight formations, in which the dead marine organisms were eventually pressed and cooked into oil and gas.

Since these formations include both porous and tight rocks, the oil was able to be extracted with increasingly innovative technologies, from traditional to advanced, over the last century.

As the Permian Field approaches 100 years in age, and as our ability for technological innovation shows no sign of slowing down, production from this basin will show no sign of slowing down either.

Dr. James Conca is an expert on energy, nuclear and dirty bombs, a planetary geologist, and a professional speaker. Follow him on Twitter @jimconca and see his book at Amazon.com

forbes.com



To: Brumar89 who wrote (76127)4/14/2017 9:25:28 AM
From: Eric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
Yup,

We are getting more efficient at an accelerating pace.

Fossil fuel generation will drop as more renewable generation powers the grid.

Less electricity will be needed in the country but as we move rapidly to pure electric vehicles electric power demand will increase it slightly in the long run.

The number's don't show all of the "behind the meter" self generation from PV.

More and more folks and business's generating their own clean energy for self consumption.

Here is another one joining the increasing crowd:


In quest for clean power, Microsoft wants to bypass Puget Sound Energy under new deal


Originally published April 13, 2017 at 12:12 pm Updated April 13, 2017 at 6:43 pm


Microsoft plans to shift about 80 percent of its power in Puget Sound-area operations away from PSE, and put it out to bid to suppliers that could provide carbon-free electricity like wind power. Here, wind turbines provide electricity to about 70,000 homes annually at Puget Sound Energy’s Wild Horse Wind and Solar Facility in Kittitas County. (Alan Berner/The Seattle Times)

Microsoft could bypass Puget Sound Energy to secure clean power from other electricity generators under a tentative settlement. This also could be a harbinger of the future as more companies opt to secure their own power


By
Hal Bernton
Seattle Times staff reporter


Microsoft could bypass Puget Sound Energy to secure clean power from other electricity generators under a tentative settlement.

The settlement announced Wednesday marks a striking shift in the relationship between the state’s largest private utility and its largest corporate customer. It was spurred by Microsoft’s quest to combat climate change by using electricity that does not generate the carbon emissions released by fossil-fuel combustion.

The agreement creates a new kind of tariff for large industrial or commercial customers that opt not to buy electricity from Puget Sound Energy (PSE), which generates nearly 60 percent of its power from fossil fuels.

“This is a step that helps us gain control of our own energy destiny, and meet our renewable-energy goals,” said Irene Plenefisch, Microsoft’s government-affairs director.

This also could be a harbinger of the future as more companies seek a greener-energy footprint or opt, for some other reason, to secure their own power. And it shows how the private sector can help push suppliers toward alternative-power sources, even as the Trump administration calls for production of fossil fuels.

The agreement was reached among Microsoft, PSE and state Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) staff. Interested parties also signing the agreement include Wal-Mart Stores, Sam’s West Inc., Kroger Company and the Industrial Customers of Northwest Utilities.

The settlement must be approved by the UTC, with a decision expected later this year.

At this point, only Microsoft has expressed an interest in moving ahead with this kind of contract, according to a PSE official, and the amount of power that Microsoft would seek to buy has not been disclosed.

PSE is the state’s largest energy utility, serving more than 1.1 million Western Washington electric customers through a mix of power that it generates or buys from other producers.

PSE could not put together a package of carbon-free power that met Microsoft’s needs. So PSE worked with Microsoft to help the corporation find a way to buy its own power.

If the deal is approved, Microsoft plans to shift about 80 percent of its power in Puget Sound-area operations away from PSE, and put it out to bid to suppliers that could provide carbon-free electricity.

One option, for example, would be to purchase power from Eastern Washington public-utility districts that sell hydroelectric power. But some of the power, under the agreement, must also come from wind, solar or other renewable sources that aren’t hydropower.

Even if Microsoft does not buy PSE power, the corporation would still pay the utility to deliver electricity and help shoulder the costs of maintaining the utility’s distribution network.

The settlement calls for Microsoft to pay a $23.6 million “transition fee” that PSE would pass on to other customers. It also includes payments to the utility’s energy conservation and low-income assistance programs.

“Microsoft is still a customer. But it is an evolution in our relationship,” said Ken Johnson, director of state regulatory affairs for PSE.

Microsoft’s Plenefisch praised PSE officials for being “very innovative and flexible in thinking about this.”

For years, Microsoft has worked to reduce the corporation’s contributions to climate change. That has involved imposing an internal carbon fee on actions that generate greenhouse-gas emissions such as electricity consumption and air travel.

Since 2012, corporate officials say, global operations have been “ carbon neutral,” with the internal fee helping to generate money that’s invested in projects such as reforestation that help offset carbon pollution.

Microsoft’s leaders are pushing to move down a green path as the rise of cloud computing requires increasing amounts of electricity to store data.

“Our world is in the midst of a digital transformation that is changing the way we live, work and communicate with one another … Microsoft’s carbon program is central to our commitment to sustainability,” Microsoft president and chief legal officer Brad Smith wrote in November.

The value that Microsoft puts on carbon-free power could help influence the way utilities think about adding new power generation.

PSE, for example, has an ownership interest in four coal-powered electricity plants in Colstrip, Montana, and has announced plans to shut two of them by 2022. It is unclear how much of that power would be replaced by natural-gas-generated electricity that releases reduced amounts of carbon compared to coal, or by alternative power sources such as wind.

“Historically, a kilowatt hour was a kilowatt hour, and it really didn’t matter to the end users how that power was produced,” said Mark Vasconi, the state commission’s director of regulatory services who helped to negotiate the agreement. “That’s changing as customers’ environmental values change.”

seattletimes.com

Hal Bernton: 206-464-2581 or hbernton@seattletimes.com