SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : IDPH--Positive preliminary results for pivotal trial of ID -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: contrarian who wrote (1410)1/6/1998 6:36:00 PM
From: Pseudo Biologist  Respond to of 1762
 
Contrarian, as long as one sticks to the labeling, I'd say the chances are close to 100%. Otherwise, one would have to ask a few oncologists directly to come up with decent estimates. The upcoming FDA reforms make off-label use easier, but I am not sure how the people who pay for the treatments are going along with this. The take home message for me was that the oncology community is enthusiastic about Rituxan, and that is a good start, I would say.

PB



To: contrarian who wrote (1410)1/6/1998 11:54:00 PM
From: Bob L  Respond to of 1762
 
Sources at a large HMO in my area say Rituxan will probably be approved for coverage, but the internal review process in the HMO ordinarily takes months! The HMO approval process for Rituxan started after final FDA approval, not a minute before. If an individual patient pushes, there would probably be earlier approval for that patient. So there may a significant ramp-up time before there is widespread coverage, if this HMO is any indication.