Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: louel who wrote (133158)	4/16/2017 5:19:04 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 217825

That seems unlikely. Kim the Fatter is in a state of war with South Korea/USA with regular attacks and threats of attacks and crimes such as murder of his half brother. Kim is in no way a civilian though I don't recall him dressing up as a soldier. He is the military boss, no ifs buts or maybes or separation of powers or other differentiation that I can think of. I'm very cynical about USA attacks hither and yon and get "Chomsky" accusations over at Politics for Pros. But in the case of Kim the Fatter [probably Fattest as I recall no other North Koreans who come close to competing with his obesity], I wouldn't think badly of the USA if they did assassinate him. Similarly, with Saddam Hussein though I thought it a bad idea to conquer Iraq based on the lie of WMDs and especially to disband the military and other institutions of civil order in Iraq. It might not be a good idea to assassinate him as the likelihood of carnage is great. But it would be understandable. Mqurice