Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (29640)	1/6/1998 6:34:00 PM
From: Karl Zetmeir	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Bateman is the expert ... I would think as many processes they have both witnessed and installed ... they would have a pretty good idea of what's going to work and what's not. Are you suggesting a pilot plant needs to be built to find out?

To: go4it who wrote (29640)	1/6/1998 9:55:00 PM
From: O. H. Rundell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Chuck, If this group can't agree as to the meaning of the word, "finalization", then perhaps it has no specific meaning in the context within which it was used. I read the sentence as follows: The next funding will be used "to enhance R&D work on...finalization of a commercial recovery technique...." Or perhaps more simply, "The next money we get will, in part, go toward finding a viable recovery process." Am I reading the PR corrrectly in that none the numbers reported are from fire assay? As an aside, averaging four segments from one hole and comparing that figure with a previous assay of that hole does not "confirm" anything in any meaningful way. Much more reassaying will be necessary before one can accept the statement that "assay testing has confirmed the previous results to within acceptable levels of assay variability." But I'm lost here: Are we going forward with a geochemical reassaying project, or are we going to use fire assay to lead to "the company's first formal resource statement"? O. H.