SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (1012648)4/23/2017 9:54:21 AM
From: Thomas A Watson1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1574505
 
If the first admendment did not apply to hate speech then sharkie would have been banned years ago, Hate speech is the suppression of free speech.

hate speech always leads here



To: Land Shark who wrote (1012648)4/23/2017 9:54:51 AM
From: POKERSAM4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bonefish
FJB
jlallen
locogringo

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574505
 
Funny you should mention hate speech. No one is more guilty of that than you Left wing nuts.



To: Land Shark who wrote (1012648)4/23/2017 3:29:17 PM
From: Taro1 Recommendation

Recommended By
jlallen

  Respond to of 1574505
 

1st Amendment doesn't apply to hate speech


?????

Didn't know such a clause were part of the 1st amendment. Now, having 'learned' that, who decides what is 'hate speech' and what is not?

Please give me a specific answer with links to facts only, so I can add something useful to my limited knowledge.



To: Land Shark who wrote (1012648)4/23/2017 6:45:51 PM
From: POKERSAM1 Recommendation

Recommended By
jlallen

  Respond to of 1574505
 
Landcarp - Hate speech is protected by the first amendment. Your assertion that it is not is totally in error. "Hate speech" is fully protected in the United States under Supreme Court precedents such as Brandenburg v. Ohio and Snyder v. Phelps. The only hateful or bigoted speech that can be banned is incitement to "imminent lawless action" that poses an immediate threat.
You are soooo stupid. LOL