Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (15957)	4/23/2017 5:00:45 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 365534

>> They don't. Don't tell me. Curry's comment was posted in the first place solely because of who she is. And given the Michael Mann fiasco and the 7 or 8 years since the climateGate affair, you really can't argue the science is about the science. Given the "97% of Climate Scientists" campaign. OMG. That was NOT science. Feynman would puke his guts up on that. Even the name "denier" -- which you your self has used -- would be horribly intolerable to him. Feynman wrote a lot on the subject of this kind of pseudo-science. And he commented specifically on an outrageous tactic that is used time and again within so called climate change, where unreplicated results are used in subsequent experimentation. The "article" is taken at face value and just assumed to be true. This is not how science is done. If NOAA says something, everyone just says, "Okay, there it is. They've fixed the numbers, and it is all going forward." Science doesn't work that way. And I know you are educated and aware of this subject. Is there no point at which will rise in support of the scientific method? Or your Democrat politics rule all? Finding the cash in the refrigerator doesn't make you want to change your mind. You are a classic Yellow Dog.