Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (1014396)	5/4/2017 11:59:30 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 1574854

"Was that bogus 97% paper peer reviewed? For real?" For real; here are some papers. Consensus on Consensus - Cook et al. (2016)Authors of seven climate consensus studies — including Naomi Oreskes, Peter Doran, William Anderegg, Bart Verheggen, Ed Maibach, J. Stuart Carlton, and John Cook — co-authored a paper that should settle the expert climate consensus question once and for all. https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm = "I read the methodology and when my kids were in junior high both of them would have realized the statistical silliness of it." Write it up, and submit it to PNAS, like Anderegg did with his paper.