SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (133545)5/5/2017 5:48:00 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217553
 
name an activity where china does not face resistance

... but so what is new?

speaking of which, watch & brief on robotics, resistance, natural size

we have a vacuum-bot at home constantly on the prowl and seems to charge itself in the sun - did not look into the matter as the ladies simply decided to engage with the inevitable that is coming inexorable, freeing up time for them to deal w/ jack whenever the coconut is not taunting him

economictimes.indiatimes.com

Resistance is futile: China's conquest plan for robot industry

Bloomberg | Apr 25, 2017, 03.03 PM IST

Scenes from China’s quest to dominate the robotic future: At startup E-Deodar, a human-looking droid serves coffee to employees who are building $15,000 industrial bots that are about a third cheaper than foreign brands and are being used to automate assembly lines across the Pearl River Delta manufacturing hub.

Some 1,900 kilometers (1,200 miles) to the north, inside a lab at Beijing-based e-commerce giant JD.com Inc., a spider-like robot plunges down from its frame, seizes a book on a conveyor belt with its suctioned claws and hurls it into a crate. The machine can sort 3,600 objects an hour, four times as many as a person -- just one piece of the robotic technology the company’s developing to automate warehouses.

China is embracing robotics with the same full-on intensity that’s made it a force in high-speed rail and renewable energy. Beijing economic planners view it as a stepping stone to a broader strategic goal: dominating emerging markets for artificial intelligence, driver-less vehicles and digitally-connected appliances and homes. “China has a great history of being an effective fast follower,” said Colin Angle, chief executive officer of Bedford, Massachusetts-based vacuum and defense robot maker iRobot Corp. “The question will be ‘Can they innovate?’

Standing in the way are established robotics superpowers like Japan, South Korea, Germany and the U.S. Yet China has three big advantages--scale, growth momentum and money. It’s home to the world’s fastest-growing robotics market and vast manufacturing sector where companies are under pressure to automate. China overtook Japan in 2013 in unit sales domestically. Guangdong province, for example, announced in 2015 plans to offer 943 billion yuan ($137 billion) in subsidies to about 2,000 local companies, including both robot makers and those making autos, home appliances, and construction materials, that are looking to automate their plants.

That creates a big opening for Chinese start-ups. “The mantle of leadership is wide open,” said Justin Rose, a partner and manufacturing expert with Boston Consulting Group in Chicago. “China has the ability to rise to prominence.”

To get there, China has a two-pronged strategy. President Xi Jinping’s government wants local industrial robotics makers like E-Deodar Robot Equipment Co., Anhui Efort Intelligent Equipment Co., and Siasun Robot & Automation Co. to take on foreign players including Japan’s Fanuc Corp. or California-based Adept Technology Inc. for leadership in the $11 billion market. Chinese corporate demand is expected to power double-digit demand for factory bots, according to Gudrun Litzenberger, General Secretary of the International Federation of Robotics. In 2016, China installed 90,000 new robots. That’s one-third of the world total and 30 percent more than the year before.

Yet China’s ambitions go beyond factory robots that bolt and weld. Earlier this year, officials deployed a pollution-monitoring robot in the Zhengzhou East Railway Station, one of China’s busiest, and a Chinese deep-sea robot broke a new record, descending to 6,329 meters (21,000 feet) in the Mariana Trench in March. Xi, who in 2014 called for a “robot revolution,” was greeted by a droid when he visited a top science academy in Anhui province last year. “I’m very happy to see you, dear President. I wish you happiness every day,” said Jia Jia, who is also known as "robot goddess" for her good looks, the China Daily reported.

Right now, China lags rival nations when it comes to robot adoption. China had only 49 robots per 10,000 workers in 2015, versus 176 for the U.S., Germany’s 301 and South Korea’s world-leading 531. Yet if China’s robot build-out succeeds, it may be able to stanch the flow of factories moving overseas.

Under a sweeping proposal called “Made in China 2025,” as well as a five-year robot plan launched last April, Beijing plans to focus on automating key sectors of the economy including car manufacturing, electronics, home appliances, logistics, and food production. At the same time, the government wants to increase the share of indigenous-branded robots in China to more than 50 percent of total sales volume by 2020 from 31 percent last year.

Robot makers and the companies that automate will be eligible for subsidies, low-interest loans, tax waivers, and rent-free land. “Fair or unfair, you can expect Chinese companies will get a lot of preferential treatment and funding,” said Rose with Boston Consulting. “They actually have a comprehensive plan to get there. And their track record isn’t terrible either.”

Industrial automation is crucial for China, home to an aging population and shrinking labor force. Manufacturing wages have more than doubled in the last decade. Also, younger Chinese workers, “don’t want to do repetitive work,” said James Li, President of ABB Robotics China, the local unit of Switzerland’s ABB Ltd. and one of the first robot companies to set up in China. It supplies machines that spray paint cars and man electronics assembly lines. “Robotics is hot,” said Li, who notes that local governments are investing heavily in industrial parks to develop the technology.

The Chinese productivity push is being watched with trepidation by global competitors. “They’re putting a lot of money and a lot of effort into automation and robotics in China. There’s nothing keeping them from coming after our market,” said John Roemisch, vice-president of sales and marketing for Fanuc America Corp.

Demand for robots in China is clear enough. Less certain is whether Chinese robotics companies have the tech savvy to compete globally. Lured by tax breaks and cheap land, some 800 Chinese robotics companies have set up shop. Trouble is, some startups buy key components from Siemens or Fanuc, put them in a robot shell with an arm, and then slap on a Chinese brand name, says Chai Yueting, director of the National Engineering Laboratory for E-Commerce Technologies at Tsinghua University.

“China has lots of robot companies. But their technology often is from the Japan or U.S.,” said Chai. “China’s own specific robot technology is still very limited.”

Overcrowded Field
Chai predicts that at least half of China’s robot makers will eventually shut their operations. An overcrowded field is a challenge the government has also acknowledged. China risks being inundated with low-end robotics, Xin Guobin, the vice minister of industry and information technology, was quoted as saying in state media in March.

Still, with China’s huge demand, its financial heft, and the government’s clear desire to develop, Chai predicts a handful of globally competitive Chinese robot makers are likely to emerge.

E-Deodar aims to become one of them. Launched in 2015 by Ningbo Techmation Co., the startup has lured Chinese engineers and software developers by recreating a Silicon Valley-style work climate.

“I want employees to feel like they are coming to Starbucks, not an office,” said Max Chu, the general manager who sports short-cropped hair and a casual sweater vest.

The two-year-old Foshan-based company in southern Guangdong province has already mastered the three basic building blocks of sophisticated automated machines: servomotors, drivers and control panels. Most Chinese companies acquire these components from foreign rivals.

Landmark Deal
Having its own proprietary technology brings down costs and drives sales of about 40 robots a month. This year’s revenues are expected to reach 50 million yuan ($7.27 million), five times that of 2016, he said. “People ask me, how long can you make robots? I say, it’s simple, we will make robots until there’s no more people in factories,” said Chu.

Chinese home appliance-maker Midea Group Co. has opted to buy its way into the robotics game. In early 2017, it closed its 3.7 billion euro ($4 billion) acquisition of Augsburg, Germany-based Kuka AG, a specialist in transport and automotive robots. The deal, which faced political opposition in Germany, allows Midea to automate and boost productivity in its white goods business, while “grabbing the opportunity” in the robotics industry that’s expanding exponentially, said Andy Gu.

“We need to leverage each other’s strengths to expand our business with each other,” said Gu, the Cornell-educated vice president who led the acquisition.

The Foshan company has started to build a research center in Louisville, Kentucky, and hopes to leverage the expertise of engineers at Kuka’s Robotics Research and Development Center in Austin, Texas, said Gu.

Meanwhile, Midea’s huge sales and distribution network can help Kuka, already one of the top three robot brands globally and in the Chinese market, move into new businesses. “We are going to expand into more industries to be more diversified,” said its German CEO Till Reuter in a March interview. “Midea will help us to open the doors.”

Jointly-developed robotic vacuum cleaners will be an early priority, followed by robots to meet the healthcare needs of China’s rapidly aging population, according to Midea’s Gu, who sees a big future market for machines designed for home use. Sales of domestic service robots in 2015 increased 16 percent to 5.4 million units, propelling a $2.2 billion market, according to the International Federation of Robotics. “If the base is big enough, and the costs really come down, then there is an opportunity to really move these products,” said Gu.

The biggest robotics market of them all in China may be logistics. While Amazon took the lead with its purchase of robot maker Kiva in 2012, JD.com is now rushing to automate its business, which is still reliant on tens of thousands of warehouse workers and deliverymen on trucks and motorcycles. It is using its own self-developed test drones to deliver packages in remote, rural regions of China and is experimenting with robots that deliver packages on college campuses.

The goal is near human-less warehouses. Eventually packages will be delivered via drones or driver-less vehicles, and facial recognition software will be used to prevent delivery errors, according to JD.com Chief Technology Officer Chen Zhang. “For the new wave in intelligent robots who can learn, who can get better faster,” the developments are just beginning, said Chen. “We are all just starting out really.”

The technology gap that must be overcome by Chinese robot-makers is still substantial, and it’s hard to imagine so many startup companies surviving long-term. However, foreign executives see China producing some globally competitive robotic companies eventually.

“As they learn how to compete, they’ll be a force to be reckoned with,” said Stuart Shepherd, CEO of Gudel Inc., the U.S. unit of the eponymous Swiss robot manufacturer.



To: elmatador who wrote (133545)5/6/2017 3:43:04 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
dvdw©

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217553
 
in case you missed out, more obor watch & brief

succeed or not, the project is fun, and besides

given that it succeeded so long ago way back when, why not again

it always puzzle me when folks are steadfast believing it impossible to do again what was done once before as if it all be a big insurmountable deal

very curious

afr.com

China's OBOR revives the old Silk Road – and rewrites the road rules



Chen Haiou, chairman Hezhengyuan Group, which is importing seafood from Pakistan to sell into China. He is in Tashkurgan, near the border with Pakistan, where his company has built a cold storage unit to store the seafood. Lisa Murray

Chen Haiou is standing outside his newly built cold storage facility in Tashkurgan, a small trading town in the mountains of China's far west, close to the border with Pakistan.

The 35-year-old saxophonist-turned-seafood importer is surrounded by a posse of staff and local government officials. He is wearing sharp sunglasses, trendy riding boots and an oversized blue coat.

Standing next to his Porsche SUV, he looks more Korean pop star than Chinese businessman, an impression compounded as he explains it took three drivers no less than three days to transport his car across the country from his hometown of Shenzhen.

"I feel more comfortable driving my own car," he explains.


A new, elevated section of the Karakoram Highway or China-Pakistan Friendship Road that links Pakistan with Xinjiang in China. Lisa Murray

First impressions aside, over the next few hours it becomes clear Chen is a shrewd businessman, and risk-taking entrepreneurs like him are key to understanding China's ambitious foreign and economic policy plan to revive the old Silk Road, redraw the global trading map and expand Beijing's sphere of influence.

The One Belt, One Road (OBOR) strategy – the "belt" refers to the overland route linking China to Central Asia, Russia and Europe and the "road" is a maritime one, connecting the mainland to south-east Asia, India and Africa – was announced by Chinese President Xi Jinping in September 2013.

It has spawned an industry of OBOR specialists and consultants as governments and companies across the globe scramble to unravel its geostrategic implications, work out whether they should be involved and how best to take part in this multi-trillion dollar infrastructure roll-out.

Chen's business was set up to take advantage of a flagship OBOR project, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which is building and upgrading roads, railways and pipelines linking Gwadar Port in Pakistan to Kashgar in China's far west Xinjiang region. Tashkurgan lies near the halfway mark on the Karakoram Highway, which is a key part of the project and is getting a makeover. Beijing has invested $US46 billion in the corridor and a Chinese state-owned company now controls Gwadar port.

The revamped trade route allows Chen to import seafood from Pakistan and sell it throughout land-locked Xinjiang and into other nearby provinces. This will be welcomed as Xinjiang is up to 5000 kilometres away from China's coastal ports, earning its capital, Urumqi, the title of the world's most inland city.


Reviving the old Silk Road. A map showing China's One Belt, One Road strategy.

Chen is only just starting out, having imported 8 tonnes of prawns and fish last month and another 50 tonnes this month. However, he expects the business to ramp up quickly and is planning to bring in 10,000 tonnes of seafood this year.

"This is a very conservative estimate," Chen insists as he chooses some seafood from the storage unit to be cooked for our lunch at a nearby hotel restaurant.

"This month, I am sending two trucks to the port to bring back the seafood. By September and October I think I will be sending 8 to 10 trucks every day."

While Chen is a big believer, the jury is still out on OBOR, which also goes by the name Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Sceptics view it as China's long-term play for regional dominance, while supporters argue it is the biggest infrastructure upgrade the world has ever seen.


Breakfast at Aketao on the Karakoram Highway also known as the China-Pakistan Friendship Road in Xinjiang, China. Lisa Murray

At this stage, Australia is more sceptic than supporter and has resisted linking its northern Australia infrastructure plans with OBOR and becoming one of the 65 countries officially on board. Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull won't be among the 28 country leaders in Beijing next Sunday (May 14) and Monday for the first high-level OBOR summit, although Trade Minister Steve Ciobo is expected to attend, and the Labor Party has been more supportive of the initiative.

As a general sign of the wariness, an Australian parliamentary briefing paper last year warned "some see this initiative as a profound challenge to the current global political and economic status quo".

And Canberra faced strong criticism from security analysts as well as United States President Barack Obama when Darwin Port was sold to Chinese company Landbridge in 2015. While it is not officially listed as an OBOR project, Landbridge founder Ye Cheng has said previously the Darwin Port lease meets with China's foreign policy goals under OBOR. Since the acquisition, oversight of foreign takeovers in Australia has been tightened.

Apart from this strategic wariness in other countries, OBOR is also up against some internal challenges. In Xinjiang, which is on the OBOR frontline being China's key overland link to Europe, a dramatic security crackdown is under way, justified in Beijing as necessary to combat terrorism in the majority Muslim region although critics claim the threat from Uighur separatists has been exaggerated. At the same time, there is a lack of coordination among local governments and China has been accused of using OBOR to address chronic overcapacity in everything from steel to cement.


Police officers are stationed at regular intervals, just hundreds of metres apart, at Kashgar's old town in Xinjiang, China. Angus Grigg

China, for its part, is playing down the strategic dimensions of OBOR. In a recent editorial, state-owned newsagency Xinhua urged journalists to refer to OBOR as a "proposal" rather than a "strategy," a term that risks scaring off potential partners.

However, changing the language used to describe OBOR is not going to address widespread concerns about Beijing's motivations. Take the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, for example, on which Chen's business relies.

There is no doubt the improved roads are making a difference. We drove five hours up through the mountains from Kashgar to meet with Chen in Tashkurgan on a pristine, elevated road – the new and improved Karakoram Highway or China-Pakistan Friendship Road. Alongside a 70km section that was only just opened in January, the old dirt road is visible, skirting dangerously around the edge of the mountains renowned for frequent landslides.

The upgrade on the Chinese side has cut travelling time by two-thirds and is bound to significantly improve the economics of the region. However, it is also undoubtedly a strategic play for Beijing. A trade route through Pakistan offers China an alternative and shorter way to access the Indian Ocean, reducing its reliance on the Strait of Malacca. This maritime route to the Middle East, Africa and Europe is controlled by the US and Singapore as far as Beijing is concerned, leaving the country vulnerable to a blockade in times of conflict. Most of its energy imports come from the Middle East.


Wang He, Vice-General Manager of Jinyi Group, which is based in Horgos city in China's far west region of Xinjiang and last year sold $US70 million worth of fruit and vegetables to Kazakhstan. Lisa Murray

Peter Cai in a report for the Lowy Institute on OBOR cautions against "overstating geostrategic dimensions of [OBOR], while underappreciating the economic agenda."

"The two goals are not, in fact, contradictory," he writes. "China is using OBOR to assert its regional leadership through a vast program of economic integration. Its aim is to create a regional production chain, within which China would be a centre of advanced manufacturing and innovation, and the standard setter."

However, increasing reports of China's plans to base marines at Gwadar Port and service its navy ships, add a stark military dimension to Beijing's economic plans. As Cai points out in his report, Gwadar is a deep water port and could accommodate submarines and aircraft carriers.

In February, the state-run China Overseas Port Holding Company officially took control of operations at the port, a lease it holds until 2059. China's growing ties with Pakistan are creating significant unease in India as some of the infrastructure projects in the corridor will run through disputed territory in Islamabad-controlled Kashmir. Meanwhile, there are concerns about Pakistan's internal security situation, prompting its government to employ thousands of personnel as part of a special force to protect OBOR projects.

But Chen, who is among a league of entrepreneurs making the most of the government incentives being thrown at OBOR-related projects, is not too concerned. He says Pakistan is more stable than people think and financially, the numbers add up.

"As a company, we are not interested in politics." Composed and confident, he is reclining in an enormous leather chair in the corner of our dining room waiting for his seafood to be cooked, a process which takes time as it first has to be thawed. We are inside the town's tallest building, a four-storey hotel that is framed by the snow-capped mountains of the rugged Kunlun range. Like many businesses in Tashkurgan, Chen has invested in the hotel.

"We're just focused on business and trade," he says. "More and more companies will start taking advantage of this opportunity."

Chen's career path is an unusual one. He studied music in Beijing before moving to Shenzhen, which is on the mainland opposite Hong Kong, and starting a trading company. Shenzhen is a sister city to Tashkurgan and, encouraged by a variety of government policies to promote investment in the area as part of China's efforts to develop its western regions, Chen began buying and processing local yak meat to sell across China. Once he heard about Beijing's investment in Gwadar port and infrastructure links with Pakistan, he decided to move into seafood.


Security teams patrol the area around Kashgar's Id Kah Mosque in Xinjiang, China. Angus Grigg

It's a similar story in Horgos, a new city in Xinjiang's northwest, where enterprising entrepreneurs have flocked to take advantage of its expanding free trade zone, also a key project in OBOR.

"Ten years ago, Horgos was a cross street surrounded by single-storey houses," says Wang He, Vice-General Manager of Horgos Jinyi International Trade Group, which last year exported $US70 million of fruit and vegetables to Kazakhstan. Wang, who was inspecting a box of capsicums about to be loaded on a truck bound for Kazakhstan's largest city, Almaty, when AFR Weekend caught up with him, expects those sales to jump to $US100 million this year.

Streamlined customs processes have cut delivery times in half. Along with tax breaks and other incentives for companies in the special economic zone, this has accelerated growth in the company he started with four others just five years ago.

"After Xi Jinping announced the Belt and Road in 2013, there was a strong pick up in business sentiment in Horgos," says Wang in his dusty truck yard close to the border with Kazakhstan.

Eventually, Wang and his fellow executives are hoping to benefit from the growing number of trains travelling from a handful of cities in China such as Chongqing, Yiwu and Chengdu to places in Europe like London in the UK, Duisburg in Germany and Lodz in Poland.

"We would like to export into Europe if there are cold storage trains and the trains start operating more regularly. That's the plan. We hope it happens."

The trains, which have generated plenty of headlines, are more expensive but faster than shipping, while also cheaper than air freight. However, the logistics are still being worked out. One problem is that trains have to be changed along the way as railway gauges vary between countries. Still, the potential is there for companies to bring down transport costs and overhaul trading routes.

For Xinjiang, the trains are less important as they will more likely pass through the region rather than originate there. According to government representative Mao Hui, of the 2000 trains that travelled through Xinjiang to Europe between March 2011 and February 2017, only 238 started there.


A man at his fabric stall in Kashgar's Grand Bazaar in Xinjiang, China. Angus Grigg

Mao, who has the grand title of deputy director-general of the Leading Group Office for Opening-up Affairs of Xinjiang, says the target for trains this year is 300.

But for this vast and ethnically diverse region, there is one glaring issue.

OBOR's success depends on the free flow of goods and people across borders but Xinjiang, which is home to an estimated 10 million Uighurs, a Turkic-speaking Muslim people, is in the midst of a dramatic and draconian security crackdown.

On a day spent visiting entrepreneurs in the free trade zone in Horgos last week, AFR Weekend went through no less than 19 security checks. Bags were scanned, pockets emptied and bodies patted down.

The police presence in the cities of Horgos, Yining, Kashgar and the capital Urumqi is overwhelming.

Xinjiang's Uighur community complains it has endured decades of discrimination and repression which has resulted in the escalating tensions with China's dominant Han ethnic group. China's Communist Party rulers, meanwhile, blame Uighur separatists for a series of terrorist attacks in recent years, that have become more frequent since violent riots in 2009. They have attempted to address the issue by ratcheting up the security presence.

Under Xinjiang's new Party Secretary Chen Quanguo, a new system of so-called "grid-style social management" has been introduced. Shiny new police kiosks now occupy most street corners, complete with flashing lights and officers standing guard outside.

Chen was appointed to the top post in Xinjiang last August after what was deemed a successful stint governing China's other troublesome region, Tibet. One of his big initiatives is to stage regular and elaborate "anti-terrorism" military parades to rally the troops and put the general public on notice.


A local butcher in Kashgar's old town in Xinjiang, China. Angus Grigg


AFR Weekend witnessed three parades last week, one in Urumqi and two in Kashgar. In the latter, the old town, which is also the Islamic quarter and a major tourist attraction, was shut down on two consecutive days, with people on foot, on motor bikes and in cars queuing for hours to exit or enter the area.

On the second day, a line of armoured personnel vehicles and more than 30 trucks, each carrying several dozen troops looped the old town twice. On the second loop, the troops marched in formation along the street behind the procession of vehicles. One local shop owner shrugged his shoulders as he explained this happened regularly.

Every day, police patrol the laneways of Kashgar's old town and the area around the Id Kah Mosque in teams of three. They march a short distance before stopping and forming a triangle, their backs to each other as they stare out into the crowd.

In the morning, afternoon and evening, meanwhile, whistles are blown and shop owners in the old town line up outside their businesses armed with metal pipes or wooden sticks as part of compulsory drills to practise fighting off terrorists.

The security crackdown has been ramped up in recent months ahead of next week's OBOR summit in Beijing and the National Party Congress at the end of the year, when leadership positions will change over.

Chen is in the running for a position on the 25-member Politburo.

James Leibold, an associate professor at La Trobe University and an expert on China's ethnic relations policies, says the anti-terror rallies are Chen's way of "demonstrating his control over Xinjiang" and proving he "is a capable leader who deserves a Politburo seat."

However, the security tightening poses a dilemma for OBOR.


Xinjiang is up to 5000 kilometres away from China's coastal ports, earning its capital, Urumqi, the title of the world's most inland city. Lisa Murray

"There is a contradiction at the heart of Chinese policy," he says. "On the one hand, OBOR is all about the movement of goods, people and ideas freely across borders but then there is this security imperative we see on display in the anti-terror rallies as well as the monitoring and surveillance. Can they do both?"

The strict security measures are accompanied by paranoia about foreign journalists visiting the area. No private business person or government official would speak to AFR Weekend without prior approval and local government officials from the propaganda department insisted on being present during interviews. In Horgos, a man who said he was from the propaganda department, but had a police badge in his wallet travelled along with AFR Weekend to and from appointments.

In Kashgar, a government official was waiting at our hotel when we arrived and took down the number of our driver, who was later contacted by a police officer and asked to report on our movements. A Uighur guide we had booked for a tour of the old city suddenly cancelled and we were informed the only guides we could use were those approved by the propaganda department, an offer we declined.

On the way to Tashkurgan, there were four separate security checks, including car searches and passport inspections. Large printed signs appeared periodically alongside the highway extolling the virtues of the Communist Party – "Good Life Comes from the Good Policies of the Party" – and promoting ethnic harmony – "Integration with Ethnic Minorities is Good".

However, while AFR Weekend was in Xinjiang, there was little evidence of ethnic harmony as the government circulated a list of banned Islamic names, including "Muhammad," "Medina" and "Jihad". This followed on from the region's "Regulation on De-extremification", adopted at the end of March, which prohibits long beards and other words and actions that may be considered "extremism".

This effort to secularise Xinjiang and marginalise its Muslim people, which account for over half the population, is unlikely to play well with Muslim countries in the region, which are crucial to the success of OBOR.

All of the business people making the most of government incentives to promote development under the OBOR banner, who were interviewed for this story, were Han business people, from China's dominant ethnic group.

"China's central government exerts power by having people on the ground," says Tom Cliff, from the Australian National University, who wrote the book, Oil and Water: Being Han in Xinjiang. "Once you have the local economy beholden to the centre, it gives it more control. That comes from control over money, control over the way people interact with each other."


Shop owners in Kashgar's old town assemble for compulsory anti-terrorism drills three times a day in XInjiang, China. Lisa Murray

Asked about the conflict between overt security measures and open trade policies, Xinjiang government official Mao denies it exists.

"Making sure Xinjiang is a safe place is a top priority for the central government," he says in a large meeting room at the government offices in the regional capital, Urumqi.

"We take various measures to fight against terrorist separatists. We will cooperate with anti-terrorism forces and groups in other countries."

He pauses before emphasising "there is a good balance between development and security. It is being handled well."

The Han entrepreneurs looking to benefit from OBOR's promotion of regional trade and investment are also seemingly oblivious to the clash between the security situation in Xinjiang and its efforts to open up trade and investment links with other countries.

In Horgos, property developer Gu Yong is effusive about the strategy.

"The belt and road strategy is creating a global village without boundaries," he says at the construction site of his unfinished building, an exhibition and trade centre in the Horgos Free Trade Zone.

"We are on the front line here."


A woman sells jewellery at a stall beside the White Sand Lake along the Karakoram Highway, linking Pakistan with China's far west region of Xinjiang. Lisa Murray

He says his building is shaped like two outstretched arms toward Kazakhstan. To emphasise his point, the chairman of Xinjiang Xinlei Group (and the richest man in Horgos, according to our driver), dramatically imitates the embrace at his construction site. The back of the building will resemble two warships, he adds, insisting he is building not just an exhibition centre but an aircraft carrier. Gu clearly didn't get the memo,as outlined in the Xinhua editorial, about refraining from the use of military-related words when describing OBOR-linked projects.

Inside, Gu and his partner Shen Jian have just pointed out where the "Australia pavilion" will be, showcasing Australian-made vitamins and other healthcare products, in between the pavilions for Georgia and Taiwan. Brisbane-based company, 2 Chemist, has already been lined up as a supplier and its owner, Will Ma, said he had visited the site in Horgos. He said the pavilion would sell Blackmores and Swisse vitamins, A2 and Bellamy's infant formula and some insect spray products.

Gu and his partners have invested 550 million yuan ($106 million) in the project.

"Whoever wants to take part and benefit from the belt and road can," Gu says. "It will improve infrastructure and bring new vigour to trade."

Gu, who initially made his money building gas pipelines, is planning to open his centre on July 1, the date China's Communist Party celebrates its founding, as a "birthday present".

His building is part of a project to expand the International Centre for Boundary Cooperation (ICBC), a five-square-kilometre duty free zone first announced by China and Kazakhstan five years ago. The ICBC was established to allow Kazakh and Chinese traders to buy and sell goods from each other without requiring a visa or having to officially cross the border.

The tight security, which involves a passport check if you are a foreigner and applying for a special permission slip if you are a Chinese citizen, means the experience is similar to crossing a border. However, plenty of duty free shops and other businesses have set up there and are doing well.

Sitting on a leather couch in his shop surrounded by mink coats, Liu He, from the Horgos Jufeng Import and Export Trading Company, says his business has grown from nothing less than three years ago to more than 60 million yuan in sales last year. He began importing mink coats from the US and Denmark to sell to mainly Kazakh clients. He has broadened his range to leather as well as hats and other accessories.

The incentives offered to businesses operating here mean that Liu can be "much more price competitive".

"In Shanghai, a mink coat might sell for an average price of 10,000 yuan," he says. "Here, because of the export rebate, I can sell it for 8,700 yuan."

Wang Gang's company set up in Horgos to buy from rather than sell to Kazakhstan. Xinjiang Zhaofenghe Biotechnology Company imports wheat and then grinds it into a powder at a factory just across the border from Kazakhstan, before selling it to Chinese companies, which use it to make animal feed.

The factory employs about 80 people and was built with an investment of 53 million yuan. However, Wang says it closes during winter when it is too cold and is only one of three or four companies that has set up in the bonded zone.

Across the border from Horgos, the Kazakhstan city named Khorgos is promoting its Gateway project, a dry port for handling trans-Eurasian trains as one of the key parts of OBOR. The Gateway project includes a special economic zone for large-scale manufacturing and warehousing operations. The area officially opened at the end of last year and is being managed for 10 years by DP World, the company that helped create modern Dubai by running its main port and free trade zone.

There are 39 China-Europe routes in operation but the trains typically run just once or twice a week, so there is a push for the services to become centralised with the setting up of key transshipment hubs to make them viable.

Still, many of the projects which now come under the OBOR banner were under way well before the strategy was outlined by Xi Jinping in 2013. Perhaps now, these projects will have easier access to funding and be more coordinated, but it is still too early to tell their overall impact.

"China tends to use the back door into Central Asia as a way of countering what it sees as the containment strategy of the US," says La Trobe's Leibold.

It's the prospect of a highly coordinated strategy, driven by the central government, which has sparked global concern. China, like most countries, is looking to expand its strategic options.



To: elmatador who wrote (133545)5/6/2017 3:47:03 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217553
 
more overarching macro obor

china-briefing.com

China, ASEAN, and OBOR Trade Picks Up: How to Take Advantage
China BriefingMay 5, 2017



The recently released 2016 China bilateral trade figures may not yet herald a shifting trade dynamic for global procurement, but there are warning signs that China’s traditional trade partners in the US and EU may be coming under increasing pressure. The figures, released by the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), show significant reductions in both US and EU trade figures, with a counter-balance being provided by ASEAN and the OBOR routes, which both increased.



The decline in US and EU trade is significant, and is one reason why Western governments have been calling for Beijing to allow more market access to Chinese consumers. To date, Beijing is not really playing ball. It should be noted that China does not have free trade agreements (FTA) with either the US or EU. A decline in trade is therefore not entirely unexpected – negotiations have been dragging on for years. There are a number of pertinent questions that come to mind when reviewing the current US and EU trade position with China:

How well are China’s needs geared towards American and European manufacturers?How competitive are these needs?China wants “win-win” situations – does such trade provide this?In terms of China, there are a number of basic parameters that need to be understood when it comes to its need for trade. These are directly linked to government stability and the need for the CCP to deliver. These basics are:

Energy;Food;Security;Inexpensive consumer products.The bad news for the West is that China has been very busy over the past decade in securing energy supplies. Very little comes from the West. Instead, China has been making inroads with increasing supplies from Russia (much of Russian bilateral trade with China is in energy), Central Asia, the Gulf States, and Iran, as well as exploring – often controversially – in the South China Sea.

In terms of agricultural products, food is an on-going and pressing concern for China; the country has 20 percent of the global population yet only five percent of its arable land. Russia, long a massive agricultural giant in the Soviet era, is now starting to recover this position and is experiencing a resurgence in agricultural development as it seeks to diversify its economy. Russia, in contrast, has about two percent of the global population and 13 percent of globally available arable land. Put simply, China needs Russian agricultural exports. The Russia-China agricultural space is an obvious match and investment opportunity, and especially so given the US and EU sanctions placed on the country. This means that two of China’s key critical needs are increasingly being serviced via Moscow. China also buys significant quantities of food from its ASEAN neighbors.

In terms of consumer products, Chinese consumers need to be kept happy and entertained. Although China-India trade still lags far behind where it ought to be, the reality is that only India has the workforce able to match China’s rising middle class demands. China needs India’s manufacturing capacity, and certainly at a juncture when Indian wages are a third of those payable in China.

Both the US and EU are pointing at high-tech and innovation solutions to woo Chinese buyers. However, India and Russia are also fast moving IT driven economies, and have a great deal of talent at their disposal, as does China itself. The hard question then starts to arise – what can the US and EU sell to China that it cannot either develop itself or buy elsewhere?

This issue is further compounded when one starts to analyze China’s longer term trade intentions. These can be measured against the FTAs China is actively putting into place in the absence of any such deals with the US and EU.

These include an already implemented, proven, and successful FTA with the ASEAN bloc of nations (for a full overview of this, please click here), as well as ongoing FTA negotiations with the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) – which includes Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belarus, amongst others – in essence opening up the entire overland OBOR routes to free trade all the way from China to the EU borders with Poland and Lithuania. India is also negotiating an FTA with the EAEU. It should be noted that the recent trains journeying through to various European rail freight terminals have transversed this exact route. Those goods will become a lot more attractive once an FTA is signed off, with zero duties payable until they reach EU borders.

If anything, it suggests that the trade deficit between China and the EU is going to get worse, and that EU manufacturers currently competing with China are going to be in for a very tough time.

The options for US and EU manufacturers then are stark. Unless you are in a business that the Chinese absolutely need, competition from China, India, and Russia in particular is going to heat up. So what are the options?

Relocation to ChinaGiven that neither the US or EU have, or are likely to have, any FTA with China soon, the option when faced with competition is the old adage – “if you can’t beat them – join them.” It is going to be very tough to compete with China while paying American and European overheads. It’s worth bearing in mind that Indian and ASEAN nations’ wages are far lower still.

If selling to China is your game, then now more than ever foreign manufacturers need to consider doing this directly in China. After all, the China success story is obvious and most US and EU based manufacturers will know someone who already conducts such business in the country. China, however, is a huge country, and both overheads and deliverables can differ depending upon location. But there are options, and while China may be an obvious choice, it makes sense to have operational costs and deliverables compared with other potential locations.

Relocation to ASEANChina has an FTA with ASEAN, as does India. The ASEAN trade bloc, as concerns business activities, is essentially manageable from Singapore, already home to several thousand US and EU businesses who conduct trade throughout the region. Singapore has a British common law system and is in compliance with US FCPA banking and financial standards.

ASEAN includes the six Asian tigers of Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam, in addition to less developed nations such as Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar. Brunei, the tiny Sultanate, makes up the ten, yet is essentially an oil play. That spread of ASEAN wealth means the region will be competitive for some time to come as lower overheads are available in less developed members, and the use of intra-ASEAN labour is permitted. Setting up a manufacturing base in ASEAN allows free trade access to ASEAN itself as well as to China and India.

Relocation to India As mentioned, India has an FTA with ASEAN and is also negotiating with the EAEU. It is the only Asian country that can compete with China in terms of available labour. India also has a dynamic middle class consumer market worth about US$500 billion per annum, set to grow 50 percent by 2020. The country offers huge potential, like China, both for export manufacturing to ASEAN as well as domestic sales.

Relocation to RussiaGiven the current political stresses between Russia and the West, this may appear a long shot, but sanctions have moved the Russian economy to put greater emphasis on trade with Asia. Russia is also a huge energy and agricultural power, and has a significant IT and e-commerce market.

Businesses wishing to be involved in the development of China’s OBOR plans, for example, and especially the overland routes may wish to consider Moscow, as China is pumping billions of investment dollars into the country. It is not without significance that the China-Europe freight rail services are managed by a Russian-German joint venture, nor that the Chinese want to extend the High Speed Rail service from Moscow to Kazan all the way to Beijing. Russia also wants to develop its Arctic Ports and open up the Northern Sea Passage, which would link Asia and Europe. These are multi-billion dollar investments. Russia may not be a fashionable play right now, but when sanctions are lifted the demand for Russian expertise and market access will increase dramatically.

Accessing OBOR ProjectsAt present this is a China play; by definition, OBOR projects involve Chinese businesses. Beijing is specifically pushing this; over 700 Chinese companies signed OBOR related projects in Q1 this year. Tax guidelines have been issued by China’s Ministry of Commerce to support this.

While tax incentives are more likely to manifest themselves via the upcoming China-EAEU FTA, at present the most likely route to OBOR project participation – construction, transportation, energy, communications – are likely to be via a Chinese or Russian joint venture partner. It makes good commercial practice to be aware of which companies would be potentially suitable partners should your business have relevant equipment or technologies to offer.

SummaryThe lack of any FTA between the US and EU with China is beginning to manifest itself as China has taken steps to actively compete anyway. The China-ASEAN FTA, has had a dramatic impact on trade flows, something the now dead TPP was geared to take advantage of but has been effectively killed off, leaving US businesses out of this loop. Meanwhile, the still under negotiation China-EAEU FTA, which will open up free trade from China all the way to EU borders, will have a huge impact on EU manufacturers.

Unless domestic US and EU manufacturers can cope, this means competition is going to steadily increase, and not just from China. Given the dearth of free trade deals – the current Washington administration is not exactly friendly towards them, and the EU has its own political problems – a strategy for survival needs to be planned out. Geography here is key. Even though a company may be US or EU invested, it can still take advantage of an FTA such as the ASEAN and EAEU agreements as long as it is domiciled in one of the pertinent locations. The message is simple: it is time to join them, and if that means relocating, that’s what will need to be done to survive.




To: elmatador who wrote (133545)5/6/2017 6:59:03 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217553
 
more obor opposition

hindustantimes.com

China’s One Belt, One Road project causing maritime anxiety, says top US admiralThe commander of the US Pacific Fleet, in India for consultations with his Indian counterpart, said questions about OBOR are being raised in every country he has visited.



The maritime implications of China’s One Belt, One Road (OBOR) project are causing a “sense of anxiety” in the region, said Admiral Scott Swift, commander of the US Pacific Fleet who is in India for consultations with his Indian counterpart and the defence ministry.

OBOR, the upcoming Malabar naval exercise and the carrier working group were among the topics of discussion.

Uncertainty over the OBOR initiative is being raised “in every country I visit”, Swift said. Chinese warships are making an “OBOR tour” of the Pacific Ocean now, he noted, and their actions may give some insight into what Beijing plans.

China’s actions are driving “increased dialogue on what is the intent of OBOR and where it is going”, he said.

Swift was in Australia and Indonesia before he came to India and plans to visit Singapore next.

“The Malabar exercises are coming up in July in the Bay of Bengal area, “ he said. They began as navigational exercises but have grown in size and depth and now include anti-submarine warfare and air defence. Japan permanently joined the drill last year.

Asked about possible Australian participation, he said, “What countries are included is a dialogue that is robust and continuing.” He spoke of a “step by step” approach and Canberra’s application as an observer.

Read more



Swift said that while the USS Carl Vinson carrier strike force, with Japanese and South Korean warships, had been deployed near North Korea, the US believed “diplomacy would be the best way forward” to deal with the situation in the Korean peninsula.

Swift said he saw the Indian Ocean as a “sea of stability” compared to what was happening in places such as the South China Sea or even the Mediterranean Sea. He attributed this in part to India’s commitment to a rules-based order, noting how India and Bangladesh took their maritime territorial dispute to arbitration and India had accepted an unfavourable judgment.

He explained, “Security for security’s sake makes little sense. Security’s purpose is to provide stability and from that stability arises the prosperity we all enjoy.”

Asked about American assistance for India’s next aircraft carrier, he admitted the US was facing a “capacity” problem. The best US Navy carrier experts are simultaneously handling the de-commissioning of the USS Enterprise and these “same people” are in the Indo-US carrier group.

“It is difficult to accelerate the process but we have our best people working on it,” he said.

The backdrop to this cooperation was “increasing Chinese carrier capability and capacity”. China’s first carrier, which used to operate only in the Bohai Gulf, he noted, had made its foray into the South China Sea in “strike force manner” with a warship escort. The second carrier has just been launched.




To: elmatador who wrote (133545)5/6/2017 7:00:02 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217553
 
... and obor fretting

economictimes.indiatimes.com

European MPs caution OBOR could make continent subservient to China
Dipanjan Roy Chaudhury
Members of European Parliament (MEP) have expressed concern over real motives of China's mega 'One Belt, One Road' initiative and cautioned that this project could make Europe politically dependent on Beijing.

A conference titled 'European Union and OBOR', hosted by the Brussels-based South Asia Democracy Forum (SADF), was held in the European Parliament (EP) on Friday.

The objective of the conference was to discuss and understand the China-initiated ‘One Belt One Road’ (OBOR)project, Beijing’s economic, geo-political and strategic motivations behind launching this initiative, and best responses by countries in the EU, to it.

Moderated by Paulo Casaca, Executive Director of the SADF, among those who participated in the event were Ryszard Czarnecki, MEP and Vice-President of the EP, Fulvio Martusciello, MEP, Siegfried Wolf, Senior Researcher on OBOR at the SADF, and Mehran Marri, Baloch representative to the EU.

In his opening remarks, Casaca spoke of the need for greater clarity on OBOR, in view of its still ambiguous nature, and the rapid pace at which it was being used by China to make economic and strategic inroads into Europe.

Providing a perspective, Siegfried Wolf described OBOR as the most ambitious foreign policy initiative undertaken by China since 1949, and highlighted the fact that through this mega-project, China aimed to build a multi-polar world conducive to its national interests, using its economic prosperity over the previous decades to create more political and strategic space for itself, internationally.

Discussing the various components of OBOR, he stated that while China describes it in relatively altruistic terms, namely as being based on the principles of mutual benefit and win-win, many of the participating countries and partners like the EU, remain sceptical. Identifying the drawbacks of OBOR, he stated that it had no formal institutional structure, China preferred to negotiate though bilateral arrangements with individual states rather than multilaterally, there was a lack of transparency in decision-making, leading to corruption, and China preferred negotiating with the national elite in the countries concerned, to the exclusion of local actors, leading to resistance from within.

He also highlighted the fact that OBOR had long-term geo-political and strategic implications for Europe, creating political and economic dependencies, accompanied by the real threat of poorer EU states succumbing to the political leverage exercised by China, through massive infrastructure investments.

In his address, Ryszard Czarnecki, MEP, cautioned European countries not to take at face value, Chinese claims that OBOR would result in a win-win situation for all partners. He drew specific attention to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the flagship OBOR project being implemented on the ground, which had run into deep opposition from locals, who saw it as a means of further exploiting their resources, in keeping with the Chinese track record in Africa.

In his remarks, Fulvio Martusciello, MEP, referred to the currently stalled Belgrade-Budapest railway project, and stated that the unscrupulous methods adopted by China only further confirmed suspicions about the long-term objectives of OBOR. He opined that through OBOR, China would not only acquire companies in Europe, it would also try and impose Chinese regulations, standards and gradually increase its influence over countries in the region, making their economic growth dependent on China.

In his remarks, Mehran Marri referred to the first-hand experience of local Pakistani communities and the Baloch people, through whose lands the CPEC was passing, and highlighted their suffering and repression at the hands of the Pak army. Holding up the mirror to countries in Europe hoping to benefit from OBOR, he stated that as the CPEC experience clearly showed, China was not driven by any altruistic motives, and was not promoting OBOR to improve the lives of the local people. On this occasion, a short film on opposition to the CPEC in Pakistan, was also screened.

The event, held days ahead of the Belt and Road Summit in Beijing, was attended by MEPs, diplomats, academics, opinion-makers and journalists.




To: elmatador who wrote (133545)5/6/2017 7:01:15 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217553
 
and obor opining

straitstimes.com

No-win scenario for US as China's Belt and Road push forges ahead

Professor Hugh White was correct in his assessment that countries abstaining from or minimising their involvement in China's "One Belt, One Road" (Obor) initiative have done little to stymie the programme's momentum ( China's One Belt, One Road to challenge US-led order; April 25).

China's growing political clout and unquestionable industrial might are more than sufficient to unilaterally secure and execute various infrastructure projects abroad, however ambitious in scope and scale these may be.

The countries that stand to gain the most - developing nations in the target regions with untapped economic potential - have little reason to refuse China's advances.

Chinese-funded railways, shipping ports and roads are likely to catalyse domestic growth and uplift the currently disadvantaged. There are also undeniable advantages to having a wealthy power as benefactor and ally in the international arena.

Countries on the fence, including Japan and those in Western Europe, must soon decide between a bullish Beijing with a clear vision of the future and a progressively weaker Washington that has lost credibility and foreign policy direction. In this sense, the choice is quite clear.

Obor presents a seemingly no-win scenario for the United States. Open opposition and attempts to undermine an ostensibly beneficial programme would do no favours for the country's already-deteriorating public image.

Moreover, in the age of insular politics, there is a clear lack of American commitment to develop "an equally powerful and ambitious global economic vision", as Prof White has suggested.

Buying into Obor would strengthen the programme, but also comes across as a concession of global leadership. As America's leaders pause to decide their next course of action, they should recognise that the Chinese Obor campaign will keep pushing forward, with or without them.

Paul Chan Poh Hoi



To: elmatador who wrote (133545)6/14/2017 4:39:11 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217553
 
team japan seems to be wavering

even as tribe india remains vociferous

a lot of fun to watch & brief on obor