Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Vennix who wrote (29652)	1/7/1998 9:59:00 AM
From: O. H. Rundell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Alan, Haven't there been volumes of discussion on this thread regarding various assay methods as applied to the dirt at BR, and regarding how it is that most can give erroneous numbers (often zero, sometimes high) because of interferrence? My recollection is that the concensus was that neutron activation gave the best hope of accurate results; although, I don't think the issue was ever settled. That aside, has IPM abandoned fire assay? I don't see the words "fire assay" anywhere in the PR. But then, I don't see any mention of Lycopodium either. Also missing is the term, "COC". Just some observations, O. H.