SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (372)5/25/2017 7:49:33 PM
From: John Vosilla2 Recommendations

Recommended By
bart13
John Pitera

  Respond to of 13784
 
TJ thinks debts under control in China??

Still thinking key is US mortgage debt aggregate levels need a major expansionary push before any deleveraging collapse... Possibly why the markets love what is happening. Stalemate politically no fiscal stimulus, no trade wars and can't deregulate banking keeps slow growth, status quo and goldilocks going as far as the eye can see??



To: elmatador who wrote (372)5/26/2017 3:05:16 PM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13784
 
Oil And The S&P 500

May 26, 2017 9:36 AM ET|.

Marc Chandler

Summary
The correlation between oil and the S&P 500 is unstable.

It is currently low, especially on the basis of percent change.

Knowing what oil is doing does not generate much insight now into what S&P 500 will do.



The fluctuation of oil prices is often cited as an important factor driving equities. Our work shows that this is not always the case and that the correlation between the price of oil and the S&P 500 continues to ease.

We looked at the statistical relationship in two different ways. We ran the correlation simply on the direction of oil and the direction of the S&P 500. Then, we conducted the correlation on the percent change of each time series.

The first Great Graphic (created on Bloomberg) here shows the rolling 60-day correlation of the level of the S&P and the level of oil since the beginning of last year. In early 2016, the correlation was almost perfect but steadily fell and spent a good part of the second half of the year negatively correlated. Late in the year, the correlation began recovering, and February reached almost 0.8. However, a month later, it was into inverse territory. It is now -0.36.




The second chart here shows the correlation based on the percentage change of each time series. Ultimately, investors are interested in the correlation of returns. In Q1 2016, the correlation reached almost 0.60, fell by 2/3 to 0.20 before the end of Q2 2016. It recovered in Q3 but was unable to surpass the earlier levels. By the time OPEC announced its decision to reduce output to encourage a drawdown of inventories, the correlation was trending lower. It briefly dipped into negative territory in February before it recovered in March but has been trending gently lower over the past two months and now is near 0.18.



The takeaway is that based on current correlations, investors in the S&P 500 should not put much weight on the direction of oil. The correlation is not particularly stable, and it is low now. Of course, some sectors will be more sensitive than other sectors to the change in oil prices. However, knowing the change in oil prices will not give one much help in anticipating the S&P 500 index.

seekingalpha.com