Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (19203)	5/24/2017 7:44:13 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 356371

More like "we'll have to do it in 1000 cities Why do you suppose, or do you know, they are defending the extant footprint rather than zoning or otherwise regulating to disallow at-risk new construction? Or maybe they're doing both. I've always thought that the first step would be to disallow building anything intended to last longer than the time available in vulnerable locations. You could build a cottage on the beach, for example, because beach cottages aren't intended to be permanent, but not a high rise condominium or a museum.