Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (1018793)	6/2/2017 6:12:00 AM
From: Bill	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572629

Humans can't control the climate.

To: puborectalis who wrote (1018793)	6/2/2017 6:53:23 AM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Recommended By FJB locogringo PKRBKR Respond to of 1572629

that "accord" was non binding so India. russia ,china and the rest of the world would Ignore it and the USA would waste 1.5 trillion a year (26,000 per us citizen a year) on it. it was an accord to break america. are you REALLY that stupid

To: puborectalis who wrote (1018793)	6/2/2017 3:49:05 PM
From: Taro	Respond to of 1572629

Do too much, and we’ve wasted some money; do too little, and we’ve doomed civilization. Bjørn Lomborg, the Dane, starting with his "The Sceptical Environmentalist" tried to point out, that maybe there is a 3rd alternative: to invest that possibly otherwise "wasted money" - and we are talking about real monstrous funds here - by betting those billions on more practical projects like limiting the damage of tsunamis etc in exposed areas as opposed to blow it all on a few monstrous voodoo projects with dubious outcome at the best.

To: puborectalis who wrote (1018793)	6/2/2017 3:51:55 PM
From: Taro	Respond to of 1572629

Do too much, and we’ve wasted some money; do too little, and we’ve doomed civilization. Bjørn Lomborg, the Dane, starting with his "The Sceptical Environmentalist" tried to point out, that maybe there is a 3rd alternative: to invest that possibly otherwise "wasted money" - and we are talking about real monstrous funds here - by betting those billions on more practical projects like limiting the damage of tsunamis etc in exposed areas as opposed to blow it all on a few monstrous voodoo projects with dubious outcome at the best. en.wikipedia.org