SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canada Carbon CCB-V -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: the Chief who wrote (1829)6/5/2017 5:51:44 PM
From: philv1 Recommendation

Recommended By
hoperrs

  Respond to of 1871
 
Thanks for sharing the info Chief.



To: the Chief who wrote (1829)6/5/2017 7:13:17 PM
From: RSCorky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1871
 
So just to confirm your rebuttal.

1) some of the protestors at the mine protest were actually there to protest a completely unrelated issue. They weren't there to protest the mine but rather the expropriation of their dairy farming land (citation needed).

2) the mine has already passed an EA that has not been made public, but which you have read although likely cannot produce here, and the mine has also gotten approval from the MRC, as proven by a source that you have also seen but cannot produce here. And the MRC approved that based on the independent study they requested. Which I'm sure you've also seen but cannot produce here.

And he accuses ME of distortion. Protesters there for other reasons? Gimme a break. Even someone who is that senile/dishonest could do better than that



To: the Chief who wrote (1829)6/5/2017 8:20:37 PM
From: RSCorky  Respond to of 1871
 
"Some of the protestors came out to protest a compltley unrelated issue. Nothing to see here folks! We'll have complete approval and be mining in no time. The fact that they named the Mayor shows that people weren't even protesting the mine, they were protesting the Mayor as a completely seperate issue. "

Seriously...