Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (29657)	1/7/1998 1:23:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

<<..Chuck to write the next release -- that's Bankes, not Chucau (sorry)..>> I understand, Jim Currie and I were just talking about such a wording! Everywhere I go, I leave dino fooprints. Maybe, Tim and you remember that Lew post about $12.00 off the shelf "AA" fire assay. A real while back. Maybe it has nothing to doi with todays discussion, maybe it ws in response to one of the Anti-News articles, I can't rember. Maybe it is apropo, maybe not. IPM has not changed anything, as any other company, UNTILL an announcement is infact made. Tim is talking a no-news item, I hope; if he found a SUSPECT THING, it should be explained with a correct news release. IMHO. Ask your self, why would Bateman not be mentioned? An oversight, possibly. Not envolved in this batch BECAUSE of some reason, CHOICE #1)- Not on contract for this job function, might I add whatever it is!, #2)- They were not paid on time and hense, would not let their name be put on the report, I say not likely...some of the funds of the PP whateverthingshouldbeavailable!, or #3)- Lyco or some other UN-NAMED CONTRACTOR is doing a sub-function that will not be needed to be announced until it is finished...why...could they even allow it to be announced now??? ? Chuca P.S.- O.H.- Do you understand?

To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (29657)	1/7/1998 1:24:00 PM
From: go4it	Respond to of 35569

Well I wouldn't be able to promise that you would like the release but I doubt there would be many questions about it either. I really can understand the need to not get too detailed in the releases because the people that are first to break the extraction code and/or maintain appropriate financing are really going to be the king of the dirt hill and it is a fine line that must be walked between informed investors and informing the competition but overall corporate procedures and communication need to be revised IMHO.