Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (1021665)	6/18/2017 9:32:48 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573433

"How can there be obstruction of justice on a Russian collusion case that does not exist?" It's obstruction when you shut it down, regardless of the final outcome. It's a shame that you are so stupid, comrade.

To: locogringo who wrote (1021665)	6/18/2017 4:24:46 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By rdkflorida2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573433

The Russian collusion investigation began before the election. It didn't target Trump personally till Trump said openly (to Lester Holt and the Russian foreign minister and ambassador) he fired Comey in order to shutdown the investigation into Flynn and others. That's when the obstruction of justice investigation probably began ... at present we only have Trump's tweets as official confirmation of that. How can the assistant AG recommend firing of Comey then select a Special Counsel to investigate the firing of Comey as obstruction? Because he was ordered by Trump to draft arguments for Comey's firing and none of Rosenstein's arguments had to do with the Russian investigation. There was no investigation of obstruction until Trump provided evidence of obstruction. Obviously. I'll remember than changing one's mind is being a whore now. Don't forget Newt was compensated by an ambassador's position for his wife. Prostitutes are paid