SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (22183)6/20/2017 8:40:29 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 355571
 
Sheesh. That was not my point. My point was science vs paranormal. AGW is science. It may be considered by some to be lousy science, but it's science.



To: i-node who wrote (22183)6/20/2017 10:27:05 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 355571
 
Which, of course, it isn't. The reason there is a consensus is that, when the evidence and the science is examined, there is a compelling case for climate change. But dispute the evidence and the science. Like a Flat-Earther disputes the evidence that the Earth is a globe. Or the tobacco companies disputed the evidence that linked cancer and smoking.

You are no different than them.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News