Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (1022675)	6/26/2017 6:44:21 AM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1578299

only 122 wow who votes for the Pulitzer why the NY Times editorial board. It's a joke of a prize like the oscars, participation prize who own's the times now a hate america mexican, use to be a time when only americans could own major media outlets because our former leaders knew how easily people like you with low IQs could be brainwashed

To: puborectalis who wrote (1022675)	6/26/2017 6:56:37 AM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578299

Some critics of the Pulitzer Prize have accused the organization of favoring those who support liberal causes or oppose conservative causes. Syndicated columnist L. Brent Bozellsaid that the Pulitzer Prize has a "liberal legacy", particularly in its prize for commentary. [31] He pointed to a 31-year period in which only five conservatives won prizes for commentary. The claim is also supported by a statement from the 2010 Pulitzer Prize winner for commentary, Kathleen Parker: "It's only because I'm a conservative basher that I'm now recognized." [32] A 2012 academic study by journalism professor Yong Volz and Chinese University journalism professor Francis Lee found "that only 27% of Pulitzer winners since 1991 were females, while newsrooms are about 33% female." [33] [34] The study concluded that the majority of female "winners enjoyed access to greater resources than the average male winner," resources including such things as attendance at Ivy League schools, metropolitan upbringing, or employment with an elite publication such as the New York Times. [35]