Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (44337)	1/7/1998 9:10:00 PM
From: Barry A. Watzman	Respond to of 186894

>re: "If there is anything that is close to a communist system, it is a monopoly." and "The tactics are the same. Bullying, coersion, paranoia, extorsion. I think Andy just recreated the nightmare from which he escaped." Joe, I think that you jumping to an invalid conclusion. It is not illegal to be a monopoly, and being a monopoly does not imply that one even using "Bullying, coersion, paranoia, extorsion". A company can, in fact, become a monopoly simply by supplying the BEST products at the LOWEST prices with the best service. There is no automatic connection between being a monopoly and using the tactics which you describe. A monopoly might or might not attempt to use such tactics, just as a non-monopolistic competitor might, or might not, attempt to use them. That's what antitrust laws are all about, really, among other things (like "giving" away a product which is only a part of your business, but which is all of the business of a potentially dangerous competitor, for example). The DOJ is investigating Intel, and my guess is that when the investigation is complete, there will be little or no action because, in general, I don't think that Intel is engaging in the practices which you site, practices which we agreee are unfair, but which are hardly the definition of a monopoly. And, finally, with all of that said, and given the success that AMD and Cyrix are having (not to mention IDT Centaur, or even non-X86 CPU manufacturers), I don't even accept the underlying contention that Intel even IS a monopoly at this time.