SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rocky Reid who wrote (42768)1/7/1998 7:47:00 PM
From: Frank Drumond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
I repeat, you said this last year too....

You were wrong last year too...

cRock!, need I say more.....



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (42768)1/7/1998 8:12:00 PM
From: FuzzFace  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
Rocky, I know why you are doing this, and it is very kind of you. You're just feeling sorry for JWK because he was having to go back almost a year to find your really dumb posts. So you thoughtfully decided to supply him with a new batch. Am I right?



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (42768)1/7/1998 8:58:00 PM
From: Linda Pearson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
Rocky,
<What will you do when 4th Q Earnings are announced, and the stock fails yet again to react positively?>

Please explain the problem here again...

tscn.com

Linda



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (42768)1/7/1998 10:28:00 PM
From: sheila rothstein  Respond to of 58324
 
Rocky, You said that IOM's earnings are forcast to be 35% more next year, but you know there are many other co's growing at a much larger percentage. Could you please name three and I'll sell my IOM shares and buy these co's. Awaiting your response, SR



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (42768)1/8/1998 7:00:00 AM
From: cellhigh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
rocky that kind of talk coming from a fellow iomaniac baffles me
why was it you were long this stock???