Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1024692)	7/14/2017 4:41:22 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573501

Gorka explains to Jake Tapper why Trump won’t punish Russia for election meddling and it’s amazing… Jul. 13, 2017 5:03 pm by The Right Scoop Trump’s Deputy Assistant, Sebastian Gorka, spoke with Jake Tapper .......... about Russia and actually explains why Trump won’t punish Russia for the election meddling. .................. The first question from Jake is why Trump is considering the return to Russia of diplomatic compounds (in Md and NY) that the Obama administration seized last year. Gorka’s direct response was because Trump wants to give ‘collaboration and cooperation’ with Russia a chance. [ Note this collaboration is with Russia spying on the US in the US. ] Why? Gorka explains, citing Syria as the primary example, that there are issues of ‘common cause’ and that if we see good faith efforts coming from the Kremlin, such as their efforts in the ceasefire, then we can improve our relations with Russia. Jake’s follow up is to ask why Trump would reward Russia with these diplomatic compounds when Trump’s own intelligence officials testified before Congress that Russia absolutely meddled in our elections last year, something that Trump seems to only half-heartedly agree with. Gorka’s response to this one is amazing, asking Jake in turn why he wants the US to have bad relations with Russia. !!! It was a good, logical question by Tapper but Gorka’s response is to impune the motivation of Tapper? C’mon, that’s pathetic. Gorka goes on to suggest that Trump is a pragmatist on our relations with Russia and that it’s not a good idea for us to ‘escalate’ tensions with them. Jake then asks Gorka if it isn’t a weak response by Trump to let Russia go without any punishment. Well that got Gorka’s ire up a little, because he can’t just let Tapper suggest that Trump is weak, and so he goes through a litany of reasons why Trump is not weak in any way, shape, or form. Seriously. Gorka finally gets around to answering the question – sort of – saying that Trump PRESSED Putin on this at the G20 and now we just have to move on because people in Syria are dying. So that’s basically it. We have to give back Russia’s diplomatic compounds and not punish them in any way so we can cooperate/collaborate with them in Syria. Isn’t that the very definition of weakness? [ Yes. ] Read more: therightscoop.com ossnhughie Elmer Gantry Russian Talking point for the win!! (In other words any confrontation of Russia will lead to WW3) thanks for playing though you Russia apologist [ Only choices, kiss Russia's ass or thermonuclear war. ] Don Sutherland Translation: Shared interests in certain areas are insufficient to allow the United States and Russia to cooperate in those areas. U.S. appeasement of Russia is necessary. Gorka is articulating exceptional weakness or foreign policy naïveté or some combination of the two.