Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (29664)	1/8/1998 12:34:00 AM
From: go4it	Respond to of 35569

Matt, That was, in reality, a very interesting article that you posted. As sad as it may sound I wasn't even aware that a paid stock promoter was required to disclose such information. Morally of course but didn't realize that there were legal ramifications to it. I haven't talked to CL for awhile so if you drop him a line in the next few days tell him Chuck said not to sweat the small crap and if he was getting paid and I'm not then heads are going to role.

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (29664)	1/8/1998 12:44:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Matt, I think they should get after C.L. for the same reasons. His touting of IPM, a stock in which he had an interest and he claimed he had inside knowledge of that it was good and true had convinced many people to invest/buy more stock, and we all know what happened. Has anyone ever though of a class action against C.L.? It might just dig up some fine facts. Why is this coggins accusing you and Frank of being C.L.? A lawsuit like that might just stop hi harassing e-mails. Bill