SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (44353)1/7/1998 10:30:00 PM
From: Barry A. Watzman  Respond to of 186894
 
Mary,

On an overall basis, I'd actually have to agree with your analysis. It's just that your original post suggested that his performance appeared to have been flawless. I am simply pointing out that there have, indeed, been significant flaws, which never-the-less do not prevent the overall six year net result from being extremely positive.

That said, I do in fact think that Pfeiffer has a personal vendetta against Intel, and pursuing the vendetta instead of what is REALLY in Compaq's best interest could be his -- and Compaq's -- downfall. Not sure that it will happen (again), but he and the company got burned BAD in 1996 in a sequence of events which I belive fits this description perfectly.

I have to admit, I can't understand why Intel is not afforded a higher PE than a Compaq or a Dell, but I have come to accept it for the time being. I've made a small fortune in Intel, and lost half of it since August. I don't know what will happen this year, and when I get out (I have INTCW, so I MUST get out), I'm not sure that I won't just stay out for a while. I feel that 1998 -- possibly all of it -- COULD be a downer, and possibly even part of 1999. Everything I've seen, however, suggests that with Merced, Intel is going to blow everything out again beginning sometime between late 98 and 2000 if there are no execution screw-ups. By the early part of the next century, say 2002 or 2003, I expect Intel and it's stock to have doubled to quadrupled (or more) from their current position.

Regards,
Barry



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (44353)1/8/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Mary - re: "a screw driver or a leatherman at most."

What's a "Leatherman"?

Paul



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (44353)1/8/1998 12:27:00 AM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 186894
 
Mary,

why else would they reward CPQ with PE of 25+ on Net Profit Margin of 8.7% and market share in the teens. Whereas INTC has margins over 25% and market share near 90% and lots of real technology and PE only in the high teens.

Present growth and more room to grow in the future?

Joe