Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GPS Info who wrote (60459)	7/20/2017 3:25:44 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Respond to of 71456

Not surprisingly, a Google search with the image shown only provides links to Snopes and a number of fake-news websites. google.com Similarly a Google search of the name "Malcom Howard", links to Snopes, fake-news websites and biographies of a Malcolm Howard and a Malcom Howard who both died in the 1880s. google.com

To: GPS Info who wrote (60459)	7/20/2017 8:48:53 PM
From: ggersh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71456

The Snopes explanation for the story being false is as bad as the original story, don't you think?

To: GPS Info who wrote (60459)	7/28/2017 3:23:21 PM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By ggersh Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71456

Snopes also believes that WTC building 7 was brought down by fires in the building. Just looking at the snopes report. Very interesting. Snopes is a small family run biz and they have been under scrutiny before. They have typically passed the test of being good fact vs. fiction checkers. Lets get to 911 though. They have quoted.... "The conspiracy theory that WTC7 was brought down through a secret controlled demolition (thereby establishing that the 9/11 attacks were a “false flag operation” and/or an “inside job”) have been comprehensively debunked, with the evidence demonstrating that fire alone caused the building’s collapse." It then points to a popular mechanics website article. That is what NIST and Western civilization has now stooped to. Utter baloney published in Popular Mechanics, and there isnt a University, school or College out there who are brave enough to publish real science. Opps sorry I forgot about the school teacher David Chandler. Anyone who fails to understand the salient points he put across (imho) should not be allowed anywhere near structural design, analysis, or anything remotely connected with construction of anything higher than 100cms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rP9Qp5QWRMQ