SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dvdw© who wrote (134822)8/1/2017 10:03:44 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 219426
 
in the mean time, another hoot
we of SI all appreciate how fully-absorbing and at-time-wasting back & forth posting can get unless treated as a purely social event or as sanity-check on a particular macro take
and here we have the key administrators of nation all wrapped up in back&forth tweeting

if nothing else, the trump did the necessary to put the wrench in the gear works

bbc.com

How White House officials were 'fooled by email prankster'



TwitterThe hacker shared emails on Twitter that he sent while pretending to be Reince Priebus, the recently sacked White House chief of staffA UK hacker reportedly fooled top White House officials into engaging in fake email exchanges.

The self-proclaimed "email prankster" convinced a senior cyber security adviser he was the president's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, CNN says.

He also goaded the then media chief, Anthony Scaramucci, in the guise of ex-chief of staff Reince Priebus.

Concerns about cyber security are running high amid claims hackers interfered in the US election.

The White House told CNN it was investigating the latest incident and took the issue very seriously.

The prankster posted some of the email exchanges on Twitter, where he describes himself as a "lazy anarchist", and said he was doing it for fun. On Tuesday he promised not to target the White House again, but said "you need to tighten up IT policy".

Here are three of the most memorable parts of the hoax:

1. Security adviser gives out personal email addressHomeland Security Adviser Tom Bossert was apparently tricked into believing Mr Kushner had invited him to a party and gave out his personal email address unsolicited.

"Tom, we are arranging a bit of a soirée towards the end of August," the fake Mr Kushner wrote in emails shared with CNN. "It would be great if you could make it, I promise food of at least comparible [sic] quality to that which we ate in Iraq. Should be a great evening."

Mr Bossert replied: "Thanks, Jared. With a promise like that, I can't refuse. Also, if you ever need it, my personal email is [redacted]."

The people around Donald Trump Jared Kushner, Trump's trusted son-in-law Russia: The 'cloud' over the White House



ReutersThe prankster pretended to be Jared Kushner, a senior White House adviser and husband of Mr Trump's daughter IvankaThe cyber security adviser has not commented publicly on the reports.

2. Scaramucci row: A Shakespearean tale of jealousy and betrayal?A day after Mr Priebus was removed as White House chief of staff, the hacker emailed then-White House media chief Mr Scaramucci pretending to be his adversary.

The fake Mr Priebus accused Mr Scaramucci of being "breathtakingly hypocritical" and acting in a way not "even remotely classy".

Mr Scaramucci, appointed communications director a week earlier, had accused Mr Priebus - a Republican Party stalwart - of leaking to the press. He also phoned a reporter to unleash a profanity-filled rant against Mr Priebus, whom he called a "paranoid schizophrenic".
Tricked by the fake emails on Saturday, the real Mr Scaramucci said: "You know what you did. We all do. Even today. But rest assured we were prepared. A Man would apologize."

When the pretend Mr Priebus wrote back defending his work, Mr Scaramucci responded: "Read Shakespeare. Particularly Othello."



Mr Scaramucci was sacked as President Trump's media chief on Monday.

3. Donald Trump Jr cottons onEric Trump, too, was briefly hoodwinked by the prankster emailing as his older brother, Donald Trump Jr, about a long-range hunting rifle.

But Donald Jr soon realised it was a scam and replied: "I have sent this to law enforcement who will handle from here."

Experts told CNN the incidents showed how even the most powerful people in America remained vulnerable to phishing attacks, where hackers send fake emails to induce individuals to reveal personal information.
Concern about politicians being targeted is particularly high after the attack on the Democratic National Committee during the US presidential election.

US authorities attributed that incident to Russia and said that a significant component of the attack involved phishing.

More recently, the electoral campaign of President Emmanuel Macron in France was targeted by a similar campaign.

Analysis:

'All they do is spoof the email'

Chris Baraniuk, BBC News technology reporter

If you think your email address is proof of who you are, think again. It's long been a feature of the technology that someone can set up a mail server to send emails that look as though they have come from another person. Say "reince.priebus@whitehouse.gov".

But in such cases, any reply to that message will go to the real "reince.priebus@whitehouse.gov". The email prankster was able to receive the replies, of course, because he or she published them. How?

While we don't know the details, it's possible that an email address was set up at a domain name that was very similar to "whitehouse.gov".

It's a well-known problem, says cyber security expert Prof Alan Woodward at the University of Surrey. He points out that scammers in the UK have been known to email house buyers with an apparent message from their solicitor. It asks them to transfer payment to the scammer's account.

"All they do is they spoof the email by changing one character," says Prof Woodward. The recipient's eye hastily skims over the altered or missing letter, and the message is simply taken as legitimate



To: dvdw© who wrote (134822)8/1/2017 10:34:27 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 219426
 
suspect nail-gunning epidemic cometh this way



To: dvdw© who wrote (134822)10/16/2017 5:57:53 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 219426
 
watch & brief

wait & see

supposedly step by step

with overarching purpose

etc etc

ft.com

China seeks dominance of global AI industry

Beijing challenges US with plan to create $150bn artificial intelligence sector
10 hours ago



Big data: the race is on to develop artificial intelligenceIf the development of artificial intelligence is an arms race, then China wants to become the world’s unchallenged AI superpower. While the National Science Foundation in the US has no increase in funding this year, China has promised to “vigorously use governmental and social capital” to dominate the industry.

US and Chinese tech companies alike are ploughing money and talent into AI, but Beijing’s blueprint for investing in artificial intelligence — creating a $150bn industry by 2030 — underlines its desire to beat the US.

While industrial policy is no guarantee of success — contrary to aims, China has failed so far to create global champions in semiconductors or cars — few are dismissing Beijing’s clout in AI, the ability of machines to mimic human thinking and carry out tasks ranging from targeting advertisements to playing Go.

“2030 is too pessimistic,” says Kai-Fu Lee, a veteran of Microsoft Research and Google who now runs his own venture capital firm Sinovation Ventures in Beijing. He reels off China’s advantages: the sheer number of people; data; talent; even the superior number of lines of code being written.

At 730m, China’s online population alone is almost twice the size of America’s and more tech-savvy. “Mobile [use] in China is light years ahead of anywhere else,” says one tech player. “So you have a huge experimental lab for exciting AI applications. In China we see different consumer behaviours every day, in the US it’s a lot slower.”



Next, there is a huge supply of data, the lifeblood of AI applications from self-driving cars to ecommerce sites that throw up customised lists of products we are more likely to buy. Privacy laws are weak and China begins collecting information on its citizens from the moment they are born while tech giants Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent — collectively known as BAT — are privy to what they buy, where they travel and who they chat to.

“When it comes to government data, the US doesn’t match what China collects on its citizens at all,” says James Lewis, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “They have a big sandbox to play in and a lot of toys and good people.”

China’s cheque book is also unmatched in the US, where budgets are being cut. “The Chinese invest billions, we [the US] spend millions. It’s hard to see how you wing it when you are being outspent a thousand to one. We are not going to win when we are outgunned to that extent; even if they are half as efficient it’s still 500:1.”

Some say Chinese efficiency in the sector is improving anyway. “The way the government is putting money in is getting smarter and smarter,” says Ming Lei, one of the co-founders of Baidu and now co-director at Peking University’s AI Innovation Center.

“Before they just gave money to research projects or big SOEs or universities. But now they are more likely to give it to a private company, to one that is more active and can really produce the products and services.”



Americans, themselves facing cutbacks in research, are gently sweating at the prospect of China surging ahead in a technology that has strong military as well as civil applications — a point Beijing itself stressed in its paper outlining its AI goals.

“[China] must, looking at the world, take the development of AI to the national strategic level?.?.?.?firmly seize the strategic initiative in the new stage of international competition in AI development, to create new competitive advantage, opening up the development of new space, and effectively protecting national security.”

Adds Elsa Kania, an analyst focusing on the Chinese military and emerging technologies: “The People’s Liberation Army seeks to leverage private sector advances in AI, while actively pursuing AI-enabled capabilities within the defence industry and military research institutes.”

There are detractors who play down China’s strengths and say the country is too far behind in technology and lacks the talent to play catch-up. A recent LinkedIn survey showed that China had just 50,000 people working in tech-related roles in AI — ranking it well below the 850,000 of the US and just one-third the level of the UK and India.

One way China, both at government and private level, is seeking to catch up is by writing big cheques to woo overseas talent — particularly hai gui, sea turtles or returning Chinese who have gone overseas to study and stayed a year or two. The poster child for the turtles is Qi Lu, formerly of Microsoft and now running Baidu.

It remains to be seen whether the cross-pollination of talent will be matched with ideas: the extent to which China will join the global community in developing and advancing AI, rather than merely competing in an arms race between nations.

Chinese engineers are quick to point to the sharing nature of the research. Many work on open platforms — so much so that Baidu claims that its recently-released code base enables a single person to assemble a vehicle capable of (limited) autonomous driving in just three days.

But the risk remains that China, or indeed any of the tech titans — China’s three BAT companies, plus Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Amazon — control what stands to be the keys to the next industrial revolution.

“Will the seven giants of AI become secretive and create a virtuous circle [doing more and accumulating more data] leaving everyone else looking for crumbs?” asks Mr Lee. “I don’t agree with that, but I think it’s plausible at least.”

Either way, China is putting ample money and political capital into its relentless drive to reign supreme in AI.

China overtakes EU in AI papers
China’s output of academic papers on artificial intelligence overtook the 28 EU countries combined for the first time last year, a Financial Times analysis has found.

The result shows how seriously the country takes its target of becoming “world-leading” in artificial intelligence research and applications by 2030, as outlined in a government policy on AI development this summer.

China hopes to leapfrog the US and Europe in using the technology to improve economic efficiency — as well as national security.

FT analysis based on Elsevier’s SciVal and Scopus data, the world’s largest database of academic publications covering more than 5,000 publishers, shows that in 2016 China increased its output of AI-related papers by almost 20 per cent compared with the previous year, while EU and US output dropped. During the year China published 4,724 AI papers, while the EU published 3,932.

However, the quality of fundamental research remains a problem. Although China leads the world in quantity of AI research, it lags behind the EU in terms of number of AI papers in the top 5 per cent of most cited research — but still overtook the US in this metric last year.

Yuan Yang and Yingzhi Yang