Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1027068)

8/8/2017 1:26:47 PM

From: Brumar89

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576830

HANNITY THREATENS LAWSUIT IF OBAMA ADMINISTRATION “UNMASKED” HIM IN NSA SURVEILLANCE

[ [ Trumpy real news. Not fake news. Believe me. ]

Infowars.com has published evidence Donald Trump and Alex Jones under illegal NSA surveillance
Jerome Corsi | Infowars.com - AUGUST 7, 2017 370 Comments

IMAGE CREDITS: PAUL ZIMMERMAN/GETTY IMAGES.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Fox News host Sean Hannity has laid down a challenge that he will sue the Obama administration if it turns out he was under NSA surveillance and his name was “unmasked” either within the administration or to members of the press.

[ How do you sue an administration that doesn't exist anymore? I guess in Trumpsters minds the Obama administration is always there (maybe it operates out of Obama's house - all the Obama people meet there daily to issue orders to the deep state), just as Hillary is always ready to sweep in to the Oval Office on her broomstick.

If? "Within the administration"? So if they said the name Hannity anytime he's going to sue? ]

“I am going to sanction the biggest lawsuit that I possibly can with the biggest attorneys in the country so we can do something to stop the shredding of the Constitution,” Hannity said in a radio broadcast on Aug. 4, noting that he has on “pretty good authority” that he was under Obama administration NSA electronic surveillance and that the Obama administration “unmasked” his name.

[ Biggest lawsuit? Biggest attorneys? He's been listening to Trumpov a long time.

"pretty good authority"? If Alex Jones says something on Infowars, you can sue the shadow Obama government over it. Probably goes for the National Enquirer too. Trumpov vouches for these news organizations. ]

On March 20, Infowars.com published records obtained from Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse that individual records of hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens were under National Security Agency (NSA) electronic surveillance in the years 2004 through 2010, in a database that suggests both Donald J. Trump and Alex Jones were under illegal, unauthorized government monitoring during those years.

Fox News reported on June 23 that Judicial Watch was unable to obtain records on Trump’s 2016 campaign team “unmasking” because all relevant NSA records have been transferred to President Obama’s yet-unopened presidential library and will not be available to the public for five years.

[ Aha, that's where the Obama administration meets now ... the Presidential library. ]

Disclosure of the names of U.S. citizens identified through the course of NSA electronic surveillance of foreign operatives under FISA-court authorization is a federal crime, regardless whether the “unmasking” involves disclosure within the government or to outside sources, including the press.

[ Since Alex Jones disclosed these names, shouldn't he be charged? ]

On April 3, Fox News reported that Susan Rice, the former national security adviser under then-President Barack Obama, requested to unmask the names of Trump transition officials caught up in surveillance.

“The unmasked names, of people associated with Donald Trump, were then sent to all those at the National Security Council, some at the Defense Department, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-CIA Director John Brennan – essentially, the officials at the top, including former Rice deputy Ben Rhodes,” Fox News noted.

“The names were part of incidental electronic surveillance of candidate and President-elect Trump and people close to him, including family members, for up to a year before he took office,” Fox News stressed.

On Aug. 2, Washington Free Beacon reported that former United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power is believed to have made “hundreds” of unmasking requests to identify individuals named in classified intelligence community reports related to Trump and his transition team.

Rep. Devin Nunes, Rep.-Calif., chair of the House Intelligence Committee, in a letter dated July 27, addressed to Daniel Coats, Director of National Intelligence, noted that since the 2016 election, there have been “numerous leaks alleging inappropriate or unlawful activity” by individuals associated with President Trump.

Nunes also commented the House Intelligence Committee also understands “that Obama-era officials sought the identities of Trump transition officials within intelligence reports,” commenting that Obama-era officials “may have used this information for improper purposes, including the possibility of leaking.”

Last Friday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the Department of Justice was opening an investigation, pursuing criminal charges against people who leaked classified information, presumably including Obama-era officials who may have “unmasked” Trump campaign and transition team members from NSA electronic surveillance records.

Last Thursday, a controversy developed over the disclosure of an unclassified letter Trump’s national security adviser, Gen. H. R. McMaster, sent to Susan Rice’s home, giving her unfettered and continuing access to classified information and waiving her “need-to-know” requirement she viewed or received since leaving the Obama White House, despite concerns over Rice’s involvement in the Obama administration’s developing “unmasking” scandal.

infowars.com