Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (44399)	1/8/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: Barry A. Watzman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Jim, You are absolutely correct: My original post was mere speculation on my part (I thought I made that clear in the original post), and I also agree with you that it is Pfeiffer's job to do what is in the best interest of the company (Compaq), NOT what is in the best interest of Intel. Having said that, however, and with a couple of years of retrospective perspective, I think it is clear that in 1995-1996, what he did was NOT in the best interest of Compaq, without regard to WHY he did it. Now, it is MY SPECULATION that he's doing the same thing again, and it is MY FURTHER SPECULATION (and nothing more) that he is doing it for the same reason, which I SPECULATE, is that he has a personal vendetta against Intel. And if my speculation is wrong, so be it. It's not my intention to represent this as anything more than my personal speculation.