SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (1028939)8/27/2017 3:03:38 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1579130
 
There's another Trumpster who should step up and bail out ex-sheriff Arpaio. Of course, I don't believe any of you guys will.

arpaiolegaldefensefund.com



To: longnshort who wrote (1028939)8/27/2017 3:07:08 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579130
 
Arpaio Doesn't Share, Says MCSO Lieutenant Joe Sousa's GoFundMe Account

FRIDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2015 AT 8:38 A.M.
BY STEPHEN LEMONS



The fundraising appeal for Sousa's criminal defense attorney, should he need one.
GoFundMe.com



-
Print Article
It's every man for himself at Sheriff Joe Arpaio's version of the Andrea Gail, where the perfect storm of his contempt trial threatens to take down lieutenants and chief deputies alike.

Civil defense costs for Arpaio and his four co-defendants are getting picked up by the taxpayers of Maricopa County, naturally.

But these current and former MCSO bigwigs are on their own when it comes to criminal defense attorneys, who may be needed should federal Judge G. Murray Snow decide to refer the civil case for possible prosecution of criminal contempt.

Arpaio and Chief Deputy Jerry Sheridan have admitted to civil contempt of Snow's orders. Their three co-defendants have not. Though it's likely that just Arpaio and Sheridan will face criminal contempt allegations, the others still have to worry about the possibility.

Arpaio's criminal attorney, Mel McDonald, who belongs to the same law firm as Arpaio's civil lawyers, will not say how he's getting paid for services rendered.

Still, the sheriff has appealed to the public via fundraising e-mails for donations to his legal defense fund.

RELATED STORIES Arpaio Wants You to Pay His Criminal Attorney Tab, as He Loses Again in Melendres Arpaio Seeks Cash from Suckers to Fight Criminal Allegations Arpaio Incriminates Self During Contempt Trial
But Arpaio does not share the wealth, according to the GoFundMe account for MCSO Lieutenant Joe Sousa, former commander of Arpaio's notorious Human Smuggling Unit.

The recently created account notes that Sousa is an 18 1/2-year veteran of the Sheriff's Office, and it takes Arpaio and Sheridan to task for not helping those a little lower down on the law enforcement food chain.

The page offers the following explanation:

Initially, Joe was told by the Chief Deputy, "we are all in this together", and that the Sheriff's Legal Defense Fund would cover his attorney fees, which began incurring the early part of 2015. However, two months ago, Joe's attorney was notified that his fees would no longer be covered by the Legal Fund. Upon speaking with the Chief Deputy for reconsideration of that decision, Joe was told that there was barely enough money in the Fund to pay for "me and the Sheriff".

Due to this extraordinary circumstance of having to pay his own legal fees for following the direction of the Sheriff's Office in furtherance of his duties, Joe is attempting to raise $20,000.00 to cover his current and future legal expenses.

I asked Sousa about the account after court on Thursday, telling him that I planned to write about his GoFundMe page. He said thanks but would only reply "no comment" to repeated questions.

I have not yet had a chance to ask Arpaio or Sheridan about the account's claims.

Interestingly, Judge Snow has suggested cutting Sousa loose from the trial, but the parties have yet to stipulate to this, and Sousa remains under the gun for now.

If the situation is portrayed accurately by the fundraising effort, it appears unfair.

However, there were times when Sousa gave press conferences claiming the MCSO doesn't use racial profiling. He also was vocal in telling public officials and community leaders critical of Arpaio's sweeps in Latino neighborhoods to "shut up."

In the days before the HSU was disbanded, the MCSO's immigrant-hunting "suppression" sweeps spread fear throughout metro Phoenix, sometimes literally separating children from their mothers and otherwise ripping families apart.

Even Latinos whose families have lived in this state for generations had to be concerned about harassment from the MCSO.

Does Sousa now feel sympathy for the people his men terrorized in the days before the federal court intervened, declared the MCSO guilty of racial profiling, and put an end to the HSU's activities?

He hasn't said so.

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/arpaio-doesnt-share-says-mcso-lieutenant-joe-sousas-gofundme-account-7711389



To: longnshort who wrote (1028939)8/27/2017 3:11:36 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1579130
 
Arpaio Seeks Cash from Suckers to Fight Criminal Allegations

THURSDAY, MAY 21, 2015 AT 11:48 A.M.
BY STEPHEN LEMONS



Arpaio: looking for chumps to pay for his criminal defense...
MCSO

Talk about chutzpah.

If a well-dressed moocher were to approach you and ask for money to fight a serious criminal allegation, would you give it to him?

What if he admitted that he might, kinda-sorta be guilty? And, oh, he has a well-paying job (six figures), owns loads of pricey real estate, and gets chauffeured around town on the people's dime.

Well, that's basically what Sheriff Joe is doing in this latest appeal to "patriots" to pony up cash for his criminal defense.

See also:
- THE $50 MILLION SHERIFF

Yep, Joe knows there's one born every minute, and he's counting on the stupidity of those in receipt of this latest e-mail blast to score him some much needed loot for his legal defense fund.

Here's Joe's very disingenuous pitch:

You've been a tremendous supporter of my campaigns through the years and because of that I'm asking for your help with my legal defense fund.

You see, in the daily exercise of doing my job I am often targeted by groups that file legal actions against me for a variety of reasons.

In some instances I have to personally pay for attorneys to represent me in these cases. I do not have the personal wealth or the wherewithal to keep up with the costly demands of paying for attorneys to defend me.

But Arpaio doesn't have to worry about lawyers' fees for civil cases. Maricopa County picks up the tab there, and has spent scores of millions of taxpayer dollars defending Arpaio over the years.

Currently, in the Melendres case, Arpaio's civil defense attorney Michele Iafrate is on contract with the county. She gets nothing from Arpaio.

The county is not paying for Arpaio's criminal defense attorney Mel McDonald, who has been sitting in on the proceedings.



Part one of the Arpaio appeal for cash...


RELATED STORIES Arpaio Doesn't Share, Says MCSO Lieutenant Joe Sousa's GoFundMe Account
Arpaio and his chief deputy Jerry Sheridan have admitted they are in civil contempt of the federal court's orders in Melendres.

If the case is referred by Judge G. Murray Snow to another judge for criminal contempt proceedings, Arpaio will have to find the money to pay for McDonald to defend his sorry tuchis.

There's also the possibility of other criminal allegations, if the U.S. Attorney's Office gets off its hindquarters for a change: perjury, obstruction of justice, intimidating a federal judge, and so on.

Which is why Arpaio needs suckers to give and give generously to his legal defense fund.

Because he sure as heck doesn't want to pay out of his own pocket.

Even though he has it.

According to public records, Arpaio and his wife Ava are millionaires a couple of times over.

Currently, under the limited liability corporation Ava Investments, the Arpaios own 10 lots in Scottsdale and Fountain Hills.

Including their Fountain Hills home, the current cash value of the properties, according to figures from the Maricopa County Assessor's Office, is more than $2.4 million.

The Arpaios also retain at least a 50 percent interest in their Scottsdale business, Starworld Travel Agency, according to Joe's 2012 financial disclosure statement, on file with the county.

The business is active and in good standing with the corporation commission.

Joe is listed as the company's secretary. Ava is listed as president.

In a 2012 financial disclosure statement, Arpaio lists himself and Ava having a 50 percent interest in the business.

Arpaio's co-authored two memoirs, which he's peddled furiously in the past.

And then there's Arpaio's salary of more than $100,000 per year, and the various pensions that he benefits from.

Judge Snow has spoken of the need for Arpaio to have some " skin in the game," and Arpaio has offered to pay $100,000 to a Hispanic civil rights organization, as part of his civil mea culpa.

Snow also has stated that he wants to make sure any such fines were not coming out of Arpaio's legal defense fund.



Part two of Arpaio's appeal for cash...


Though I'm not sure how that would work. There are too many ways for people to funnel money to Joe.

By the end of FY 2016, Melendres will have cost county taxpayers more than $50 million, a figure that's sure to increase exponentially with time.

My sources say Arpaio's blown as much as $1 million in RICO funds on his Koo-Koo-for-Cocoa-Puffs snipe hunt in Seattle.

That investigation along with the improper investigation of Snow's wife have prolongued the civil contempt trial, and thus the tab that will be paid by you and me.

And this schnorer wants money for his criminal defense?

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/arpaio-seeks-cash-from-suckers-to-fight-criminal-allegations-7346960



To: longnshort who wrote (1028939)8/27/2017 3:26:52 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1579130
 
'Tough' sheriff botched sex-crime cases

Not tough on sex-crimes. For one who believes in the entity the New Testament calls The Enemy, it's not surprising that evil in one area is accompanied by evil in another.

Jesus never told us to be blind to evil or to call evil good.

By Jacques Billeaud

Associated Press / December 4, 2011

EL MIRAGE, Ariz.—The 13-year-old girl opened the door of her home in this small city on the edge of Phoenix to encounter a man who said that his car had broken down and he needed to use the phone. Once inside, the man pummeled the teen from behind, knocking her unconscious and sexually assaulting her.

Seven months before, in an apartment two miles away, another 13-year-old girl was fondled in the middle of the night by her mother's live-in boyfriend. She woke up in her room at least twice a week to find him standing over her, claiming to be looking for her mother's cell phone.

Both cases were among more than 400 sex-crimes reported to Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's office during a three-year period ending in 2007 -- including dozens of alleged child molestations -- that were inadequately investigated and in some instances were not worked at all, according to current and former police officers familiar with the cases.

In El Mirage alone, where Arpaio's office was providing contract police services, officials discovered at least 32 reported child molestations -- with victims as young as 2 years old -- where the sheriff's office failed to follow through, even though suspects were known in all but six cases.

Many of the victims, said a retired El Mirage police official who reviewed the files, were children of illegal immigrants.

The botched sex-crimes investigations have served as an embarrassment to a department whose sheriff is the self-described "America's Toughest Sheriff" and a national hero to conservatives on the immigration issue.

Arpaio's office refused several requests over a period of months to answer questions about the investigations and declined a public records request for an internal affairs report, citing potential disciplinary actions.

Brian Sands, a top sheriff's official who is in charge of the potential discipline of any responsible employees, was later made available to talk about the cases. He declined to say why they weren't investigated. "There are policy violations that have occurred here," Sands said. "It's obvious, but I can't comment on who or what."

Sands said officers had subsequently moved to clear up inadequately investigated sex-crimes in El Mirage and elsewhere in the county. He said leads were worked if they existed and cases were closed if there was no further evidence to pursue.

Arpaio's office was under contract to provide police services in El Mirage as the city struggled with its then dysfunctional department. After the contract ended and El Mirage was re-establishing its own police operation, the city spent a year sifting through layers of disturbingly incomplete casework.

El Mirage Detective Jerry Laird, who reviewed some the investigations, learned from a sheriff's summary of 50 to 75 cases files he picked up from Arpaio's office that an overwhelming majority of them hadn't been worked.

That meant there were no follow-up reports, no collection of additional forensic evidence and zero effort made after the initial report of the crime was taken.

"I think that at some point prior to the contract (for police services) running out, they put their feet on the desk, and that was that," Laird said.

Arpaio acknowledged his office had completed an internal probe into the inadequate investigations, but said, "I don't think it's right to get into it until we get to the bottom of this and see if there's disciplinary action against any employees."

A small number of cases from El Mirage were handed over to prosecutors, but the El Mirage Police Department said most were no longer viable -- evidence dating as far back as 2006 had grown cold or wasn't collected in the first place, victims had either moved away or otherwise moved on.


Bill Louis, then-assistant El Mirage police chief who reviewed the files after the sheriff's contract ended, believes the decision to ignore the cases was made deliberately by supervisors in Arpaio's office -- and not by individual investigators.

"I know the investigators. I just cannot believe they would wholesale discount these cases. No way," Louis said. "The direction had to come (from) up the food chain."

Louis said he believes whoever made the decision knew that illegal immigrants -- who are often transient and fear the police -- were unlikely to complain about the quality of investigations. He said some cases also involved families here legally.

El Mirage paid the sheriff's office $2.7 million for a wide range of police protection from 2005 through mid-October 2007, after the city's police department had been criticized in an audit as poorly organized, loosely supervised and mismanaged.

Although a small number of El Mirage officers continued working there during the period, Arpaio brought in patrol officers and detectives and managers who ran the department.

El Mirage police files obtained by The Associated Press through public records requests establish a pattern of sex-crimes not actually being investigated after the crimes were reported to Arpaio's office.

In April 2007, a 3-year-old girl was reported molested by her father, an illegal immigrant who cared for the child while her mother was at work. When the mother confronted her husband about the abuse, he cried and swore he'd never do it again.

Yet a few days later, the mother noticed more signs of sexual abuse on her daughter and called for help. After the initial report, that help didn't come.

The string of unresolved cases left Elizabeth Ditlevson, deputy director for the Arizona Coalition Against Domestic Violence, shaking her head. "My impressions were anger at the system and concern for the people whose cases weren't addressed," she said.

According to both Sands and Scott Freeman, a sheriff's official who heard complaints from then-El Mirage Police Chief Mike Frazier about the quality of the sex-crimes investigations, more than 400 cases countywide had to be reopened. Freeman told outside investigators examining alleged managerial misconduct at Arpaio's office that a number of arrests were made in the reopened cases.

The April 2011 report on alleged managerial misconduct said the sheriff's internal effort to determine what had gone wrong with the sex-crimes investigations was twice derailed.

One delay occurred when the male sheriff's official leading the inquiry was accused of sexual harassment -- this by a female supervisor whose portfolio included some of the mishandled cases, according to the report.

Another internal affairs investigation, launched in May 2008, was stopped after the investigator was pulled away at the direction of David Hendershott, then the top aide to Arpaio, to help with another matter. The internal probe was reopened in December 2010 while Hendershott was on medical leave, according to the 2011 summary.

Hendershott's account conflicted with others.

Hendershott, who has since resigned amid separate misconduct allegations and declined a request by the AP to comment, told investigators the internal affairs inquiry was still in progress when he went on medical leave in 2010.

Still, Hendershott told investigators that the El Mirage Police Department had good reason to be upset about the sex-crimes handled by the sheriff's office.

The report of the 13-year-old who had been inappropriately touched by her mother's live-in boyfriend had been faxed to one of Arpaio's investigators. El Mirage police, who were given back the case about 11 months later, learned that it hadn't been worked.

When El Mirage police finally tracked down the mother, she said her boyfriend had moved out and that she no longer had contact with him. She and her daughter were in counseling and didn't want to bring the case to court.

In their follow-up on the case of the 13-year-old attacked by the man claiming to have a broken car, El Mirage police discovered Arpaio's office hadn't interviewed the victim.

An El Mirage detective went to the girl's home just off the city's main drag. The girl's uncle said she and her mother weren't around and took the investigator's card with a promise to ask them to call.

The mother never called back. She and her daughter's whereabouts are unknown.

The case of the molested 3-year-old was returned to El Mirage police unworked five months after the initial report. The family's beige tract home was deserted, the phone disconnected.

archive.boston.com