SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (31880)8/30/2017 10:55:03 PM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361476
 
Isn't Jeff the richest man now? He was.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (31880)8/30/2017 11:02:48 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 361476
 
He's been in the 1% since long before he created 500k jobs.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (31880)9/1/2017 11:56:49 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 361476
 
But back when he wasn't in the 1 percent he also had not created a ton of jobs.

Many "one per-centers" were not always wealthy. Many of them are in the one percent only for a short time.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (31880)9/2/2017 12:45:52 AM
From: zzpat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361476
 
Your logic is flawed. Giving tax cuts to a class of people because they are rich is idiotic. If you want job growth give tax cuts to those who create jobs, not to everyone in the rich class. But before you do that, pay back all the money you borrowed to give them previous tax cuts and pay down all the debt.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News