SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack of All Trades who wrote (201956)9/6/2017 11:34:38 AM
From: weatherguru2 Recommendations

Recommended By
rayrohn
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224718
 
Exactly, what is measured from a plane and extrapolated to the surface is way different than what is measured on the surface. Here's a station reading with the eye passing directly over. 27.24 in-Hg and winds of 120 gusting to 155. Based on surface measurements, that's weaker than Hugo.

The device broke shortly after. I know Camille in 1969 destroyed just about all measurement devices.




To: Jack of All Trades who wrote (201956)9/6/2017 11:40:43 AM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224718
 
We will never know how strong the older past storms were because we didn't have data that we have today to compare to.

This is the koolaid Kenneth guzzles