Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Point and Figure Charting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AdvocatusDiaboli who wrote (29259)	9/10/2017 9:08:36 AM
From: Fintas	1 Recommendation Recommended By toccodolce Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34816

Actually what you see is the game of PILE ON. Whether it's reading Zman's board or other. One of the reasons IMO is some are making MONEY using the sites. Some disclose. Some do NOT. So what if disclosure is required. Now once that is understood then let someone have a different view of what another's strategy is and RUH ROO. So it's not a matter of burying the hatchet. That is easily done. On this board there is but ONE ban. I did not have a thing to do with it. SI RON did. Yet in conversation with the one who was banned I was told its up to ME to get those who contacted SI RON. HUH. This isn't my board. I'm just a guest. I was told.. I was HELD PARTLY responsible. HUH. Sort of reminds me on Saudi Arabia. A man is driving his vehicle.. stops at a stop sign and KABOOM is hit from behind by another. The Saudi's agent shows up and looks at the situation.. then makes a ruling. 95% is the fault of the person who ran into the car at the stop sign and the other 5% is the guy stopped legally. HUH.. Well the agent would say. IF you were NOT there.. you would not be hit. And that my friends is what happens when one attempts to have a logical discussion with one who is not logical. BOTTOM line. RAREBIRD was banned because he had previously been banned on GZ board due to political differences. He then came to THIS BOARD and caused all kinds of noise for days that had not a thing to do with PNF but taking shot upon shot at me because I did not defend him on GZ's Board. That led to whatever that cause SI RON to ban him. PLAIN and SIMPLE. Take responsibility. Now to the flip side. I was banned on Rarebirds board because I banned him on this board. Which is a complete LIE. I can not ban. I do NOT ban. SI RON banned him. PERIOD. So while you yak about this and that.. FACT is many are NOT logical. There are still some taking shots at ZMAN. There are some taking shots at HUMBLE. And heck they are always taking shots at me. HEY MYTHIE.. you ducking me again? Why did you put a recommend on that dumb post re BAC by RAREBIRD. Are you two related? BOTH Zman and Humble put up a ton of good work. Each can be spot on at times and at times be off FOR THE MOMENT. Da CHIEF for years has pointed to the UP and been correct LONG LONG TERM. BUT let's keep it real. Those 50% declines can take your breath away and cost ya money. BUT while I'm here to those who would say.. Just buy the DOW at hmm 800 and hold it till 22k.. NOT too shabby. Then again why not just buy BRK.A for 40-50 and hold it to 247K per share. I'd say BRK.A wins by a land slide. Fintas