Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (1030143)	9/10/2017 9:06:59 PM
From: Behind Blue Eyes	Respond to of 1578232

Well that explains everything.. Trump was abused.. Someone stepped on him !!

To: Land Shark who wrote (1030143)	9/11/2017 6:13:38 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Mick Mørmøny Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578232

Hurricane expert Klotzbach: #Irma at landfall comes in 7th behind 1935 Labor Day storm Anthony Watts / 1 day ago September 10, 2017 While this won’t be of much comfort for those that are squarely in it’s path right now, it is a small bit of good news. Dr. Philip Klotzbach has compiled rankings of both hurricane Irma and Harvey when they made landfall. Compared to the 1935 Labor Day storm, Irma is a distant 7th, tied with the 1928 Lake Okeechobee storm. He writes: Table of all hurricanes with landfall pressures <= 940 mb at time of U.S. landfall. #Irma was 929 mb and #Harvey was 938 mb. With Irma ranked 7th, and Harvey ranked 18th, it’s going to be tough for climate alarmists to try connecting these two storms to being driven by CO2/global warming. But they’ll do it anyway.