Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (35018)

9/14/2017 12:01:45 AM

From: koan

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 356710

What you are doing is trying to fine other cases that you think proves your validity for being against global warming, but neither science or logic works that way.

A much better way to determine the validity of science is the simple matter of seeing how many of the worlds scientists believe it.

That method easily is right the most often.

While sometimes wrong, consensus of opinion is usually right.

<<

>>>"That was a time before modern science. Today no one would believe any of that stuff."<<<

18 Science Facts You Believed In The 1990s That Are Now Totally Wrong

buzzfeed.com