Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Roger Brown who wrote (4017)	1/8/1998 5:49:00 PM
From: Grantcw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

Roger, Thank you for posting the entire article. I'm glad that the Gigamux and IQX 200 were both mentioned. This should definitely spur some investors to check this company out. I wonder if we were the biggest gain today for stocks over $2. We were in the top ten yesterday for that category on the Nasdaq. That may have gotten some momentum investors in today. Hopefully they will jump in again tomorrow on our side! Grant

To: Roger Brown who wrote (4017)	1/8/1998 6:01:00 PM
From: JohnT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

Am I reading the following correctly for the WSJ article? "Gladue projects Osicom will be profitable in the fiscal fourth quarter ending Jan. 31, although he anticipates a loss of 89 cents a share for the year due to the charges in the second quarter and a loss of 28 cents a share in the third quarter." 1st Qtr. $32.6 mil sales .08 per share 2nd Qtr. $32.6 mil sales -1.01 per share 3rd Qtr. $23.4 mil sales -.28 per share Does this mean that the 4th Qtr. wil have income of .32 per share (.08 + -1.01 + -.28 + .32)= -.89 per share Someone please check my math........

To: Roger Brown who wrote (4017)	1/8/1998 9:35:00 PM
From: Ploni	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

"The stock was really beaten down over the past year" as hefty restructuring charges in the fiscal second quarter ended July 31 and lower-than-expected revenue in the fiscal third quarter left the company in the red..." Good thing we have Joe Gladue on our side. Do you think that Janet Morrissey edited his comments, or did he think it would be politically correct not to remind a WSJ journalist that FIBR's stock price had especially been devastated by false charges printed by the Dow Jones' other financial publication?