Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (34878)	1/8/1998 7:46:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs, I've posted questions on threads of a number of companies that I have no positions or once had positions in. In fact, I've continued to post on MSU's thread for many months after I sold my position in the stock (and contrary to the select postings you have chosen out of context to present here,) much of what I had to say has not been positive. But then my comments are there for all to see, both good and bad. Your continuing efforts to assert that I have no right to post here merely cause me to assert my 1st amendment right to do so. You and any other person have the right to post anywhere on SI that you so desire. Of course, reactions to your presence may either be positively or negatively received, but you still have the right to post. So get over it buddy.. Censorship of pertinent opinioins and information must be opposed at all opportunities. Regards, Ron

To: Pugs who wrote (34878)	1/8/1998 11:12:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

<<<Why is it you expect some kind of decorum on threads where you have interest or investment, but come here just to slum it and slam?>> My Dear Pugsly, Just because I "slum and slam" those comments primarily made by yourself and Riley, it doesn't mean that am beyond decorum. But then I realize that you don't really understand this and likely never will. That's just a burden that all that have contact with you will have to bare. The history of this thread has shown that even those who follow decorum are ultimately derided and called liars and paid shills for the "enemy". Following decorum does not mean we have to kiss your ss, Pugs. Nor does it mean we can only post what you want us to say. But those who understood my original purpose for posting here likely realized my perspective in limiting the amount of research I did on OVIS/RMIL. I quite simply didn't want to get caught up in the unverifiable minutiae surrounding associated with analyzing a company's potential. Making phone calls several times a week to hear information from a management that obviously have a bias is not the only form of diligence. Their comments in assessing their status is not realistic diligence, nor is it something that a company can be held accountable for when it fails to come to pass. If it is material, it must be documented, plain and simple. My primary guidelines for analyzing the discussion surrounding this company were: 1). To assess the level of posting traffic being generated out here . 2). To see if there were any comparisons to what has occurred with other stocks receiving a great deal of posting traffic. 3). To discern how much information from managment was finding its way to SI as "quotable information". 4). To assess the company's filings and determine if what was being stated as fact could be verified through official filings and financials. 5). Finally, to assess whether what being stated out here was warranted by information publically available and the likelihood of adverse attention from regulatory authorities. And I believe that I attempted to maintain so level of decorum over those first several weeks. But Pugs..... Youself, Riley, as well as so many others who have BLASTED* any dissenting opinions that didn't square with your own has created an environment of hostility and derision between both the yeas and the nays. Your "facts" presented by yourself and Riley have consistently proven incorrect or unverifiable. Your open opposition to any analytical discussion of the pros and cons of RMIL, the "short squeeze", or any other topic has become the primary reason that so many Nays keep coming back and posting out here. You like to fight, Pugs. But one thing you can't fight are facts. And the facts are that this stock is halted and past history has shown that very few companies survive SEC trading halts and investigations. Do some diligence on that topic and assess the odds. Regards, Ron