Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1031909)	9/25/2017 2:00:34 PM
From: zzpat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579297

Yes, I think Carter was a far better economic president. Forbes reviewed our post WW2 presidents and rated them on the economy. Carter came in below Reagan but only because Reagan created massive debt and a recession killed inflation - not Reagan's policies. A better question might be why do Democrats get fair better than republicans? In that same article, they said our top three economic presidents were all Clinton, LBJ and Kennedy in that order. The three worst were republicans. Forbes The article is highly flawed since it gives Reagan credit for reducing deficits, when in the real world the debt soared under his presidency....but it's a good place to start.