Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zzpat who wrote (1032114)	9/27/2017 5:39:07 PM
From: Sdgla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576831

More foolishness. The Russia meme is Dem dogma. Only fools repeat it and you are at the top of the list. You Dem fools haven't any proof and there's overwhelming evidence (in the public domain) of the dnc collaboration with Russia. Have you grasped the Clinton state dept sale of Uranium 1 ? Have you looked at the incredible amount of money paid to Bill Blu Dress Clinton from Russian banks for speeches ? Answer ... of course not.

To: zzpat who wrote (1032114)	9/27/2017 5:41:04 PM
From: Sdgla	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576831

Hope you got yours : Last month the New York Post reported that Attorney General Sessions was reviewing a highly developed form of corruption of the Obama administration’s Department of Justice. The Post report followed up on Ian Mason’s exclusive for Breitbart. Mason’s account made clear that Attorney General Sessions has already ordered a halt to the practice going forward — Mason posted the Attorney General’s June 5 memo on Scribd. The Post report emphasized the seeds planted by Obama’s DoJ and the questionable legality of the practice: “Attorney General Jeff Sessions is investigating up to $6 billion in legal settlement money that the Obama administration steered toward progressive causes and allies in left-wing advocacy groups….Former Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch regularly arranged for major corporations to make large ‘donations’ to left-leaning groups like UnidosUS — formerly the National Council of La Raza — and NeighborWorks America during settlement negotiations to end banking, environmental, civil-rights, and other federal lawsuits.” The Post also noted the questionable legality of the payouts insofar as the “groups getting the money were not victims in the cases or parties to the lawsuits, and Republicans say they had no proper claim to the cash.” Paul Sperry followed up this past Sunday in the New York Post column “How Obama is funding the anti-Trump resistance.”Sperry’s column makes a valuable contribution to understanding the forces against which the Trump administration is now contending.

To: zzpat who wrote (1032114)	9/27/2017 5:55:50 PM
From: Sdgla	4 Recommendations Recommended By FJB James Seagrove locogringo majaman1978 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576831

Report: Clinton Collected Millions In Russian Cash Before Approving Russian Uranium Deal APRIL 23, 2015 By Sean Davis Let them eat yellow cake. A blockbuster report in the New York Times today details how Hillary Clinton’s non-profit organization raked in millions from the Russian nuclear industry while Hillary was negotiating a deal to allow the Russians to acquire Uranium One, one of the world’s largest uranium mining companies: As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well. And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock. At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show. In a pattern that is becoming all too familiar, Hillary Clinton never disclosed these contributions to the White House or State Department officials. Because Uranium One owns uranium mills and tens of thousands of acres throughout several U.S. states, the Russian acquisition had to be approved by U.S. government officials. Before they could approve the deal, those U.S. officials–who reported to Hillary Clinton–had to certify that the deal would not jeopardize American national security by giving Russia an effective global monopoly on uranium supplies: Still, the ultimate authority to approve or reject the Russian acquisition rested with the cabinet officials on the foreign investment committee, including Mrs. Clinton — whose husband was collecting millions of dollars in donations from people associated with Uranium One. It appears, though, that millions in undisclosed payments to Hillary’s foundation weren’t enough for the 2016 Democratic presidential hopeful. As is often the case with the Clinton, a six-figure speech by Bill Clinton was also scheduled right after the Russians agreed to buy Uranium One: Amid this influx of Uranium One-connected money, Mr. Clinton was invited to speak in Moscow in June 2010, the same month Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One. The $500,000 fee — among Mr. Clinton’s highest — was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin that has invited world leaders, including Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, to speak at its annual investor conference. The blockbuster NYT report doesn’t just impact Hillary’s presidential hopes; it could also affect the ongoing nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran since Russia is Iran’s primary supplier of enriched uranium. Iran’s sole operating nuclear power facility in Bushehr gets the bulk of its nuclear fuel from Russia. Rosatom, the Russian uranium supplier, also struck a deal with Iran late last year to build eight more nuclear reactors, all of which would be fueled exclusively from Rosatom enriched uranium supplies–supplies which may well have been obtained through Rosatom’s acquisition of Uranium One. Hillary won't let the U.S. build a gas pipeline to Canada. But she'll let Russia buy a Canadian company to send American uranium to Iran. Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 23, 2015 The former secretary of state has remained relatively silent on the proposed Iranian nuclear deal thus far, apparently for good reason. Her opposition could sink Rosatom’s 2014 deal to provide enriched uranium to eight Iranian nuclear reactors for their entire life cycles, potentially enraging the wealthy investors who funneled millions to her family’s foundation. And if she clearly endorses the deal and Iran ends up using the enriched uranium to make a nuclear weapon, opponents could blame Hillary for approving the deal that enabled Russia to provide all that uranium to the Iranians. When asked whether the millions in payments funneled to Clinton, Inc. may have influenced Hillary’s decision to approve the Rosatom acquisition, a spokesman for Clinton’s campaign told the New York Times that no one “has ever produced a shred of evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors to the Clinton Foundation.” The spokesman did not note that any such evidence, which is currently under subpoena, was likely intentionally hidden and then destroyed at Hillary’s direction once her secret e-mail scheme came to light. Sean Davis is the co-founder of The Federalist.