Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doug from CT who wrote (8836)	1/9/1998 3:09:00 AM
From: Josef Svejk	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13949

Humbly report, Doug, it is not any particular one of the risk factors listed in the SEC document that prevents me from placing my pennies on the ZMAX table, but the collection of them. Simply put, every time I've tried outright gambling, I've lost my shirt, pants, underware, boots - the works - so I attempt to invest instead. As to who has completed any conversion project to the point that it is completely y2k compliant, I humbly believe that TEDennis, David Eddy and others are much more qualified to answer your question, but I have a hunch that they will tell you no project can be considered completely y2k compliant, until it has been proven to be so - sometime after 01/01/2000. In any case, if you want a more detailed answer to this question, I suggest you ask them, because I am about as far from being a y2k hacker authority, as ZMAX is from being a safe investment. Truth be known - a lot farther! I humbly realize this does not help you much, but it is the best I can do. Svejk (GL-15 applies: digiserve.com ;-)