To: James Seagrove who wrote (1032726 ) 10/3/2017 10:12:26 PM From: FJB 2 RecommendationsRecommended By
Respond to YOUTUBE 'demonetizing' embarrassing clips of Pelosi, Maxine Waters... The American Mirror that many Americans likely find ridiculous.several examples of content that violates its “advertiser-friendly content guidelines. Here are some that may apply:Controversial issues and sensitive events: Video content that features or focuses on sensitive topics or events including, but not limited to, war, political conflicts, terrorism or extremism, death and tragedies, sexual abuse, even if graphic imagery is not shown, is generally not eligible for ads. For example, videos about recent tragedies, even if presented for news or documentary purposes, may not be eligible for advertising given the subject matter. Are Pelosi’s and Waters’s words controversial in the eyes of YouTube? Hateful content: Video content that promotes discrimination or disparages or humiliates an individual or group of people on the basis of the individual’s or group’s race, ethnicity or ethnic origin, nationality, religion, disability, age, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalization is not eligible for advertising. Content that is satire or comedy may be exempt; however, simply stating your comedic intent is not sufficient and that content may still not be eligible for advertising. Incendiary and demeaning: Video content that is gratuitously incendiary, inflammatory, or demeaning may not be eligible for advertising. For example, video content that shames or insults an individual or group may not be eligible for advertising. Do Pelosi and Waters use “gratuitously incendiary, inflammatory, or demeaning” words about Donald Trump, according to YouTube? And if so, what does that say about them as American elected officials? theamericanmirror.com
