Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zzpat who wrote (351767)	10/7/2017 2:54:42 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 541958

Well I'm ok with a geometry class where parallel lines never intersect followed by one where parallel lines can intersect, so why not? Then another class on math where 1+1=2 and another where 1+1=36

To: zzpat who wrote (351767)	10/7/2017 7:27:19 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 541958

We sort of have that now. The people who give "wrong" answers get a higher grade: F is further into the alphabet than A, so it is better. See? We should continue to Z. The more batshit crazy your answer - the further up we go.

To: zzpat who wrote (351767)

10/7/2017 11:09:25 PM

From: koan

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541958

That is a great idea. It would show the morons for who they are. No one would go to any of the bullshit course like flat earth, or global warming, evolution bullshit denial..

The people know better they are just being assholes!!

<<

To: Sun Tzu who wrote (351762)	10/7/2017 2:05:03 PM
From: zzpat	Read Replies (2) of 351799

We need to have schools that teach both sides so our children can decide the truth. We could have a flat earth class followed by a round earth class. Both would be mandatory. That would be followed by a class on evolution and another on creation. Then another class on math where 1+1=2 and another where 1+1=36. Don't liberals want diversity?