SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (1033287)10/8/2017 5:16:58 PM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Investor Clouseau
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574053
 
I don't think you understand what internals means. How many Dimms did the freaks oversample this time? 10%? 20%? 30%? There are NO numbers of who was sampled...just the total sample by a U of C survey in the middle of Cook County Ill, in the middle of Chicago Il. Yes, very reputable but not a bit balanced or non-partisan.

Most of the time, Dimms are oversampled by 10% or more to make the answers balance out on the Dimm side.

To get these BOGUS results, the Dimm freaks ALWAYS oversample. That's why you all got GRUBERED so badly with the election predictions and with 538 with Nate fullofshit Silver.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (1033287)10/8/2017 7:14:02 PM
From: locogringo1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Respond to of 1574053
 
I apologize. I found 4 downloaded links on my desktop to the sampling after clicking on your link. As I suspect, the sample was D+9 with independents at 18% ??

In addition, blacks were sampled at a higher rate than their proportion of the population for reasons of analysis.

I wonder why 46% of the surveyed were unemployed. That's extremely odd.

Not at all representative of the general population.